theacharnian

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 hours ago

Harris needs to bring this up in the debate. Have him confess to breaking the Logan Act on live TV. Show us those prosecutor chops!

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 hours ago

What is a woman? A fuzzy type.

Same as many many many many other categories previously thought crisp. Simple example: "living thing".

Beat the right with fuzzy facts and fuzzy logic.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

And that folks is the difference between respectable, institutional brutal violence and not respectable vigilante brutal violence.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Only, if he hadn't started a special military operation none of this would be happening.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

I agree. Treating blasts on any oil and gas pipeline as a whodunit misses the point. The point being that hydrocarbons are killing the climate and we have to stop using them.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 78 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Only one person cares about these ratings, and he hates this.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 days ago

The thing that makes me chuckle is how these evolutionary psychology little stories always forget the most basic thing: humans are social animals that live in clans.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Boosting a Lemmy post in Mastodon shows up as an upvote in Lemmy. So the two concepts seem to be coupled in the activitypub substructure. I don't see how upvotes would be secret then, as I don't think it's possible to boost something privately on Mastodon.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 33 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

And then called him a two bit union buster. She was on fire 🔥🔥🔥

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 55 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Well that's a convenient naming coincidence.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 54 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

She added that she had repeatedly asked the council to install a speed camera outside the restaurant in the hope it would encourage drivers to slow down.

You don't need a camera. You need bollards.

14
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/anarchism@slrpnk.net
 

Discussions about scarcity and anarchism that I've seen online seem to always talk about "scarcity in the large", i.e. how does an anarchist society allocate production, food, labour, materials etc.

I've a question about anarchism and scarcity in the small. Say, a really nice location, eg. a breezy location in a very hot climate, or the room with the nice windows in the community centre, or Bag End at the top of the hill. Say, an anarchist community has decided to use the location for purpose X, but a minority wants to use it for purpose Y. Maybe an even smaller minority wants to do Z, and a bunch of other people have their own little ideas about how to use it. Some are transient and could be accommodated (you get it on Tuesdays 5-7) but others might not be ("our sculpture project needs to dry out in that specific spot for the next 4 months, we know it blocks the view but it's the only place the breeze hits just right!") or could be contradictory (the siesta people vs the loud backgammon players can't both use the spot at high noon) or antagonistic (the teenagers who want to party late vs the new parents who need quiet for the babies). And dis-association doesn't really help here because that's the nice spot for many kilometers around or there is literally no way to create another beach for our small island community because that's literally the only place on the island where sand exists, so we can't just off and leave. (* Many of these examples are imagining a hot summer in an anarchist Greece, sorry it's almost August.)

It looks to me like a simple non-life-and-death scenario like this could potentially completely poison and destroy a community and in the face of that it would be the little death of anti-authoritarian organizing. Like yea, when life and death matters are at hand, anarchists will band together and conquer the bread. But petty small-scale little shit where it's managing annoyances and small grievances, I don't think non-authoritarian decision making can solve. And I suspect it's crap like this that has killed off many intentional communities and experiments or made them veer away from non-hierarchical, anti-authoritarian organizing.

Have anarchist thinkers seriously thought of this?

 

Submitting for this truly astonishing quote:

" Landlords in Quebec, however, feel they need to catch up to other provinces as Quebec is still one of the most affordable places to live in the country, said Jean-Olivier Reed, a spokesperson for the Quebec Landlord Association (APQ)."

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/23000968

Incapables de trouver du travail en français au Nouveau-Brunswick, ils pensent partir au Québec

 
 

The Armenians called, they are asking how the Assyrians and the Pontic Greeks are doing.

view more: next ›