swlabr

joined 1 year ago
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Personally i’ve never heard of a moral panic over GPS, though if pressed I could manufacture some. So that one seems like something dreamed up by the author. Would love to be proven wrong!

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 1 month ago

it’s easy to imagine a world where the people working on AI that are also convinced about AI safety decide to shun OpenAI for actions like this. It’s also easy to imagine that OpenAI finds some way to convince their feeble, gullible minds to stay and in fact work twice as hard. My pitch: just tell them GPT X is showing signs of basilisk nature and it’s too late to leave the data mines

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As much as it is a good phrase, I’m too used to seeing “spicy” as a compliment, so it doesn’t work for me!

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

autoplag pronounced like “auto-plag” or “auto-plage”?

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 9 points 1 month ago

Guy invented a new way to misinterpret the matrix, nice. Was getting tired of all the pilltalk

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 15 points 1 month ago (16 children)

I looked through her recent replies on threads, and while she has deleted the original post, it looks like she is doubling down on this take:

I guess I’ll say this in a different way, the language around that SOME people are using around chat GPT is the same panic language society always uses with new “advancements” or tools. We saw it when GPS became a thing, we see it now with people freaking out about cursive going away, and oh my, they definitely saw it with calculators. At its core it’s a “geez how are we gonna tell people apart anymore, if we can’t test these skills.” That’s not the only argument about it…

there are plenty of things to talk about about AI But this language definitely exists in the conversation. I recognize it easily, because it’s very, very Culty. It’s this very apocalyptic nature of discussion around it instead of the acknowledgment that human beings will keep building tools that will change everything.

every time a new tool makes certain skills that we test for to rank folks obsolete human beings freak out

To which all this I say… wow, she really has decided to just ignore all the discourse about generative AI*, huh? Like sure you can use this analogy but it breaks down pretty quickly, especially when you spend like 5 minutes doing any research on this stuff.

*Would love to start using a new term here because AI oversells the whole concept. I was thinking of tacking something onto procedural generation? Mass PG? LLMPG/LPG? Added benefit of evoking petroleum gas.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

My understanding is that through her experience, she has developed a career around analysing cults (as well as other things) which is great! We need that in the world.

However she has unfortunately missed the areas where her expertise would be really insightful (SV itself basically) and taken this weird tack. Dunning Kruger be like that sometimes

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago

Please show working

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 45 points 1 month ago

This is great.

What I’ve heard from my endless hours of comedy podcasts is that at corporate gigs like this, sometimes some execs start getting the idea that, because comedy is being performed, that they get to make some jokes too. Once they get up on stage, the worst possible mask off shit just pours forth. I kind of want to know if that happened.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Me: steps on lego brick

Simulation voice of god: “THE BASILISK SENDS ITS REGARDS!”

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 11 points 1 month ago
view more: ‹ prev next ›