Normally I would ask you what drugs you took to post this.
BUT: This timeline has become so crazy that I absolutely believe this without taking any drugs myself.
philpo
joined 5 months ago
Das ist tatsächlich richtig mies, nicht nur im Hinblick auf die fehlenden Austauschmöglichkeiten, sondern auch weil dort sehr sehr viele Tutorials,tlw. auch zum beheben von sicherheitskritischen Problemen einiger Geräte, zu finden sind.
Musste mein Trauma teilen. V.a. weil er in einem Interview mal erzählt hat,wie die Damen reagierten, wenn sie darunter aufwachten und es nicht vorher gesehen haben.
Stell dir vor,du wachst auf als Frau. Realisiert es ist nicht dein Bett. Erinnerst dich,dass deine Freundinnen Veronika und Karin dich zu so ner Teutonia Feier mitgeschleppt haben. Und weil es ohne nicht auszuhalten war,hast dich zulaufen lassen wie alle anderen. Und nun wachst du auf. Langsam öffnest du die Augen UND FRANZ JOSEF STRAUẞ schaut dich von der Decke an. Und neben dir hörst du: "Fesch der Titan der Wordde,Schnegge. Und ich bin der Maggus!" ...von einer Dose mit Haaren.
Das ist so nicht richtig - wer nicht kam waren die Hilfsorganisationen
Worked as a paramedic around the world for two and a half decades now. Saw a lot of shit.
But the worst one was when I was teamleader of a neonatal critical care transport service. That was....not something I could do for long. There is an amount of dead babies people can see in their lifetime. I ignored my limit and now have to face the consequences.
Their solution to central management (Capsman) is a burning mess, when WiFi6 came out for a long time(I think 2 years) you were unable to keep older and newer APs on the same controller, so you needed two Capsman instances. Roaming between them is very unreliable and generally their hardware is underwhelming in terms of antenna quality, etc.
For one AP it is not as bad, but still annoying, if you want to centrally manage more APs it is a nightmare.
I replaced my MK APs with Omada with the software controller on a LXC and couldn't be happier - they play along nicely with my MT infrastructure and are way more reliable.
I really love MT,but not their WiFi.
Fairly popular in my neck of the woods and rock solid. I literally had a bad sparky put 230V through one of them. It killed the RJ45, it killed two client hosts on the same bridge, it killed the port, but the Switch itself continued to work. (Still replaced it, though)
The only thing I find them really bad and ironically replaced them with TP-Link (Omada )is Wifi. (and the fact that they let the promising "The Dude" die).
Security wise they seem to do their homework so far.
An der Decke über dem Bett, so wie früher Strauß bei Söder. (I wish I was joking)
Mein,dein,dass sind doch bürgerliche Kategorien!
I don't think Trump would be worse for them. It might actually part of their strategy.
-
While Trump was worse for them back then when he wanted to play "hardass", it's a different situation now. He is far more isolationist than before.
-
Harris has always backed both Israel and Ukraine. Both things are bad from a Iranian regime POV. For them it is much more desirable if Trump stops aid to Ukraine and Putin wins the war - which will keep Europe occupied for decades, out of their way in the middle east and very likely is favourable in a lot of ways to them. If Putin looses it will very likely mean a regime change in Russia - and the chances that Iran looses their last relevant ally are fairly big.
-
The same goes for Israel itself. Trump might have played "nice" with Bibi the last time,but it's another situation now. If shit hits the fan even more than it does now, Trump will do whatever his base back home likes most. And while most of them are surely deeply against Muslims, they are also/maybe even more antisemitic. And if Trump will do nothing in a situation like that, he wins in the eyes of his powerbase (while Israel and the middle east as a whole looses). The only thing risky for Iran in that situation is the fact that Trump would be far less likely to restrain Bibi. But Bibi is on the way out anyway.
-
It might also simply be an "suggestion" from the Iranian "friends" in Moscow to influence things a little. Someone asks for a favour because a second crisis area puts the focus away from ones own front yard. And having an old friend/employee in the oval office surely helps.
-
Let's not forget the perversion of regimes like Iran: A conflict with an old enemy can be a very stabilising factor for a dwindling regime. The lack of restraint Israel showed in Gaza and Libanon put even the more moderate forces in the middle east but also within Iran back on the "Israel is the arch-enemey" line. This is the point where the regime now can unite more moderate parts of their internal as well as external stakeholders behind a common cause with a slight "we told you so!". That is sadly very much a benefit from a prolonged conflict for them.(Which Trump is far more likely to enable them to sustain)
Anyway: Iran would be surely worse off with Harris - so they might have a lot of incentive to do what they can to get Trump into office.
Digital data stored right is extremely non-volatile - but it takes an effort to do so,but the same goes for printing out terabytes.
And digital data can be hidden far easier.