olivesandpoppies

joined 3 months ago
[–] olivesandpoppies@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I used to like neighbour (for the first few months?) but I blocked her when my cousin dmd her concerned for L, and neughbour said she will never blame parents who film and post their kids because it’s the gross people we should worry about, not that the kids get posted (she was defending S, and her “right” to post her minor kids). Respect from me was gone right when she told me and showed me the dm. Of course it’s the gross people that we have to worry about , but if kids are not posted online, then that won’t happen. And also neighbour has posted stuff with L. And she also always boasted to “stay off of my page if you don’t want to protect trans kids/don’t support abortion”, but S never says anything about protecting trans kids or abortion. She also in the past said, that people with platforms should be saying some thing and people who stay silent are in the wrong. But what about SNL? Would she have stayed friends with S if there was nothing to gain financially? Probably not. Money and “small fame” ruins everyone and skews our morals. I always HOPE that people in the circle and especially SNL will snap out if it because no kid deserves this- but neighbour and those around her should know better and advocate for the kid. Would they lose their hello fresh and whatever brand deals they push? Likely. But a kid would be safer. I did used to feel the same way that you did too about neighbour though, so I get it.

[–] olivesandpoppies@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It’s abuse. Nobody in her circle or family speaking up for the sake of a child and it’s pretty disgusting. Every child deserves to have their privacy and their childhood protected.

[–] olivesandpoppies@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is why I joined this- She was not speaking up for women’s reproductive care, she wasn’t speaking up for trans kids, she wasn’t speaking up for Palestinian kids being wiped off the face of the Earth. She also post her minor children without consent, at least informed consent. It’s just funny how many people stay in her circle because they know they could benefit from her financially. I would never wanna be associated with someone who benefited me financially, yet did nothing to actually make use of a platform. All her friends are just gonna keep quitting. They’re meaningful jobs that actually make a difference in the world to push shitty high waste products. She’ll just keep traveling and increasing her carbon footprint. Honestly, my kid who is like 30 years her Junior has done more to make positive impact. We don’t need another white bleach, blonde, heavily, edited, wealthy woman, influence of anybody.

[–] olivesandpoppies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

She doesn’t care about consent. nobody in her circle does.

[–] olivesandpoppies@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

Nat’s hubby’s family are all American so they are there a lot.

[–] olivesandpoppies@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I mean… cutlet inserts, taping, water bra padding (remember the awful water bras of the early 2000s?) and stick on padding all help people achieve the cleave too? Hormones also helps with this a lot. Perkiness and lift does not happen without surgery or injections but just growth/volume can happen with smoke & mirrors (cutlets, padding, taping) or for real with HRT or weight gain . I always thought she was as least a C?

[–] olivesandpoppies@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

Can confirm (worked on a few) that these movies are push push push and the big names get shot first and fast, rarely meet any cast and then it’s up to editing crew etc to make it happen quickly. Most big names forget they’ve done them by the time they end up on streaming services (as one told me). Most filmed in summer and fall too, not greatest accommodations, not glamorous.

[–] olivesandpoppies@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Disn3y again?

She needs to read the room. And some news articles/court papers. Does she not know about recent online anger about Disn3y and their shady loopholes trying to avoid paying a spouse who lost their wife to anaphylactic reaction from negligence linked to Disn3y?

[–] olivesandpoppies@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 weeks ago

😬😵‍💫

[–] olivesandpoppies@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Oh exactly! Her lab!a was FUSED together she was so badly burned.

And also I have seen the smartest people with multiple university degrees hold hot coffee under their chin, in between legs, etc. Hot is one thing, scalding is another. McDonald’s & Disn3y both support genocide and toomany other horrible things to mention. It’s literally time to cancel them along with all these stupid influencers (and their circles of affiliate code groupies).

[–] olivesandpoppies@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

Oh totally - I’m giving the cliff notes version of it, but it’s so evil. My lawyer friend who also hates Disn3y had sent me the links to read. I was appalled, but also not surprised.

[–] olivesandpoppies@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

I don’t know if anyone is aware of what’s happening with the wrongful death suit against Disn3y, but I’ll summarize and maybe if S or any of her followers still think supporting this place/company/corporation is okay they’ll think twice.

To summarize, there was a woman who was at Disney, and she has severe allergies to dairy and nuts, and she informed the serving staff of her allergies, and they promised to accommodate her but she was still served those allergens. She died as a result of her anaphylactic reaction, and her husband was seeking legal action.

Because he subscribed to Disn3y+ on a trail basis for his PlayStation a few years ago, Disn3y is essentially claiming he cannot sue. I’m going to include some screenshots so you can go and look at these articles in the actual legal information its self as well as review your own Disn3y+ terms of service that people agree to.

So a person died due to negligence, even though they mentioned that they had severe allergies, and this family cannot seek any type of restitution due to evil legal loopholes, that this horrible company has sneakily included into a streaming service subscription. EFF Disn3y . Influencers are bought and paid for too, and if they don’t immediately see how evil this is and speak up, then they DO value money over lives. Do not support Disn3y.

view more: next ›