maegul

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 2 points 32 minutes ago* (last edited 28 minutes ago)

Yea that's a great idea! I should have mentioned it in the top post ... I wasn't going to try to organise that myself but if someone else was that would be very welcome and they could do it through here.

EDIT: I put a line in the top post about it, asking for people to share their thoughts or put their hand up

Would you be up for organising it?

Otherwise, what we could do is schedule a time and just have a mega thread here (it's what the "monsterdon" crew do over on mastodon)

Lemmy v19.4 fixed the chat sorting of comments so that you get a flat reverse-chron of comments, which could help too.

13
submitted 56 minutes ago* (last edited 30 minutes ago) by maegul@lemmy.ml to c/movies@lemm.ee
 

The votes are in ... Big Trouble in Little China beat out Dungeons and Dragons: Honour Among Thieves by a hair (1 vote it seems) (see voting post here).

IMDb | Wikipedia

Please treat this as Discussion Thread for the film over the next week or two ... or if you like, write up your own posts about it!

If you have any tips on where to get it, please feel free to share (I'll probably add them to the top post)

I've certainly never seen it and look forward to watching it!


EDIT: A live watch event might happen if it can get organised. Feel free to comment about that below or put your hand up to organise it if you're interested. We could watch it live together, or schedule a time and run a megathread here. Share your thoughts below.


Honourable Mentions

Terminator 2: Judgment Day

  • For being rather popular (came a close third in the voting).
  • It was my nomination as a nostalgia visit back to popcorn 90s AI action sci-fi, which my partner hasn't seen.
  • I'll probably watch it some time soon

Soylent Green

  • Also popular in the voting, and keeping up what might be a classic dystopian trend here

The Apartment (1960)

  • Easily the oldest film suggested this round! I've never seen it but it seems to be a classic and I really appreciate that someone nominated it (and it was popular in the voting too!)

And there were other films in the nominations too you might be interested in (see the voting post linked above) ... for me personally Underwater (2020) stood out as one I'd not heard of (despite being recent), and, as an Alien fan, I'll be more than happy to give it a watch.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 hours ago

That’s a pleasantly surprisingly diverse set of instances.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 17 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

And it feels ever more present to me that publishing things as open-source means maintenance work, which can quickly lead to burnout. People just expect you to provide updates, no matter what your license text says.

David Beazley, big in the python world and one of the OGs of the python ecosystem from back in the 90s, kinda had a moment about this a couple of years ago.

He has or had a few somewhat popular libraries and liked to write things and put them out there. But, IIRC, got fed up of the consumeristic culture that had taken over open source.

I think he put it along the lines of "The kind of open source I'm into is the 'here's a cool thing I made, feel free to use it however you want' kind" ... and didn't have positive things to say about the whole "every open source author is now a brand and vendor" thing.

The result of which, IIRC, was him archiving all of his libraries on GitHub. From a distance, it also seemed like he felt burnt out from a hacking culture in which he no longer felt like he belonged.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago

I think about this sometimes. The scorecard for the internet. Not sure it’s positive TBH.

In a more sci-fi vein, I wonder if it’s an inflection point for the evolution of society … when mass communication technology develops relative to the educational and political development of the same society.

It feels to me, in the west that is, that we were not culturally ready for mass communication. That we needed at least a few more generations of grappling with society’s problems and framing the role of the individual in the collective. That WWII probably held things back two generations. That we’ve basically squandered an opportunity and may pay the price for centuries down the line.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Yea I try to post from mastodon when it makes sense. You’re seeing the mentions as that’s how mastodon links things together. Here on lemmy, the connections are all more structural and so implicit.

This is about as good as lemmy-mastodon interaction can be: when someone posts from mastodon to a lemmy community.

Though now, with automatic hashtag-ing since v 0.19.4, the two can work together better. See https://hachyderm.io/@maegul/112720255264101773

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Been getting (back) into classic 70s Yes!

Made a playlist of Close to the Edge side A, classics from Fragile (if you know you know) and ending with Ancient Giants under the sun ... comes out to be about album length ... peak prog rock IMO ... and a strangely addictive "album" you can just listen to repeatedly.

 

In particular: https://eggplant.place/discover/

Which is running a dev version of neoDB, and so may be unstable, but has English as its main language.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

One area that I am somewhat knowledgeable about is image/video upscaling

Oh I believe you. I've seen it done on a home machine on old time-lapse photos. It might have been janky for individual photos, but as frames in a movie it easily elevated the footage.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yea this. It's a weird time though. All of it is hype and marketing hoping to cover costs by searching for some unseen product down the line ... even the original chatGPT feels like a basic marketing stunt: "If people can chat with it they'll think it's miraculous however useful it actually is".

OTOH, it's easy to forget that genuine progress has happened with this rush of AI that surprised many. Literally the year before AlphaGo beat the world champion no one thought it was going to happen any time soon. And though I haven't checked in, from what I could tell, the progress on protein folding done by DeepMind was real (however hyped it was also). Whether new things are still coming or not I don't know, but it seems more than possible. But of course, it doesn't mean there isn't a big pile of hype that will blow away in the wind.

What I ultimately find disappointing is the way the mainstream has responded to all of this.

  1. The lack of conversation about what we want this to look like in the end. There's way too much of a passive "lets see where the technology and big-corp capitalism take us and hope it doesn't lead to some sort of apocalypse"
  2. The very seamless and reflexive acceptance that an AI chat interface could be an all knowing authority for everything in life ... was somewhat shocking to me. Obviously decades of "Googling" to get the answers to things has laid the groundwork for that, but still, there was IMO an unseemly acceptance of a pretty troubling future that indicated just how easily some dark timeline could arise.
[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

The number of people I've come across who also dislike the character limit, the number of platforms that don't have it, the number of times people write long microblogging threads and the prior and continued existence of the "blogosphere" count against this defeatist pessimism IMO.

The truly dark take here, IMO, is that we shouldn't underestimate the power of a medium's configuration to shape not just the content and culture on it (that's obvious) but the way its users come to think.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yep this.

It’s gotten to the point where a character limit is itself a seriously toxic part of big-social social media, up there with algorithms and shitty moderation choices. But all of the Twitter people don’t see it.

Sure there are threads through reply chains. No one reads the chain. The first post is all most will see. Context collapse and superficiality is inevitable with this simple constraint. The fediverse should move on. Sadly, mastodon is the only platform still dedicated to it and they’re 80% of the fediverse.

If you like short funny quips and shit posts, that’s fine, there’s no character minimum! With long character limits, short quips still abound. Instead, when necessary, you can opt in to longer form text when necessary.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (10 children)

Edit: oh god, what have I done! Yea, mobile + autocorrect got me good here.

Hopefully corrected version here with original below …


So my hot take since before launch has been that this will be the end of Tim Cook‘s tenure. The more they lean into the product, as it seems they will with the next model, the more likely that seems to me.

Roughly speaking, I get the feeling it’s the first wholly new product pushed by Cook. And a big flop is never good for Apple‘a brand power.

How off do you think I am?


So my hot take since before launch has been that this will be the end of Tim Cook‘s tenure. The note they mean into the product, s as it seems they are with the next model, the more likely that seems to me.

Roughly speaking, I get the feeling it’s the first wholly new product pushed by Cook. And a big flop I’d never good for Apple‘a brand power.

How off do you think I am?

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago

Ha ... interesting ... they don't feel comparable in the same way to me.

 

It just struck me recently and I'm sharing.

As a millennial who enjoyed these shows as a young(er) adult ... I cherished them both, and at the time probably like 30 Rock more, and probably would have said that it's "the better comedy".

Over time though I've noticed I basically don't really think about 30 Rock ... frankly I almost certainly think about Seinfeld more ... but Community has "seeped in" to my TV subconscious fabric.

If I were to re-watch either right now, it'd be Community hands down. It'd be heart warming and comfortable and, I suspect, more relevant or still meaningful. By comparison, I wouldn't be surprised if 30 Rock would feel more dated, "noisy", and kinda culturally narrow and specific in a not-coincidentally SNL-like way.

30 Rock may still be "the better" TV Comedy (whatever that means). But it was written by a TV writer about making TV in New York, while Community was written about TV and its fans, IE "us", living in any random city.

23
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by maegul@lemmy.ml to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml
 

EDIT: Looked a little deeper/better on GitHub and found this issue, #4865 which is likely the most related issue, and it seems the devs are aware.

It also seems to be a recent v19.5 -ish issue too from some of the comments there


I seem to be encountering what may be a bug with pinning/featuring posts ... interested if anyone's got similar/counter experiences

The issue is that the pinning of a post doesn't get federated correctly.

The conditions, AFAICT are:

  • Post originates from a "federated instance" (IE, an instance other than the community's home instance)
  • The mod action of pinning is also done by a moderator on a "federated instance"
  • Lemmy versions 19.4 or greater (much more tentative, but from a brief perusal, it seems true)

The effect seems to be:

  • The pinning works fine on the "home instance" of the community
  • But federation breaks in two slightly different ways:
    • No pinning occurs
    • If a mod on a "federated instance" tries to pin, after an initially failed federation of "pinning", it will succeed on the federated instance only temporarily

The last dynamic is hopefully a clue to what could be happening (sounds like some queued tasks colliding in an incorrect way)

 

Upvote the film you'd like to watch the most in the comments below!

Nominations are in for July's Fedi Film Club (see nominations post here).

Each one in is a separate comment below, which you can upvote.

And, for clarity, they're also in the list below, in alphabetical order.

If you have any handy tips on the best way to get a hold of any of these, please share! Note though that the high seas in general are likely are well known option.

  • Big Trouble in Little China
  • Dungeons and Dragons: Honour Among Thieves (2023)
  • I’m Thinking of Ending Things (2020)
  • Soylent Green
  • Terminator 2: Judgment Day
  • The Andromeda Strain (1971)
  • The Apartment (1960)
  • The Peanut Butter Falcon (2019)
  • Underwater (2020)
  • Wacko (1982)

And of course, the point of all this is to crowd-source human curated film recommendations. This is definitely a diverse bunch of films, some of which I didn't know about and others I'd never seen. I'll definitely want to watch more than one of these!

 

Please suggest a film for July's "Fedi Film Club"!

Anything that either you'd like to watch or would recommend to the community.

Please make sure it's more than a year or two old so that it will (hopefully) be available somewhere.

And if possible, provide a quick description for why you'd like to watch or why you suggest it.


 

I watched them roughly once every night or two. And I'd previously seen them all.

And I was rather surprised at how I felt about the films afterwards. It seemed really clear that the quality of the films went continuously down after Casino Royal.

I thought Skyfall would stand out as the best followed by Casino Royal. But, in sequence, nah. Despite having clearly positive qualities, it seemed bloated and empty by comparison.

I also thought Quantum of Solace would rank pretty low as I recall thinking little of it at the time it came out. Instead, I thought it paired really well with Casino as a great follow up.

In fact, it felt like the Craig-era was basically Casino + Quantum and "other things". And yea, the "post-Skyfall" films just didn't feel like they were worth the effort. I thought they'd be more passable than they were, but after Casino + Quantum, which, for me, had a real punch and through-line, Spectre + No-Time-to-Die just felt like they were going through the motions and taking up space. At times, they really seemed to be badly flawed. And that's where my impression of Skyfall really hit ... it seemed that was the "what do we do now with this character?" moment and that Skyfall belonged with Spectre etc not the other way round.

Is this common among Bond fans or am I off base here?

 

About 10 mins. Focuses on some of the shooting and camera choices in Alien.

Specifically how "dirty shots" were used ("dirty" meaning some unfocused object "dirties" up the shot) and how the 2 camera setup were used.

I think the video was trying to make a point about how Alien was kinda "modern" in this regard. I don't know cinema theory well enough to know ... definitely interesting though!

Either way ... it's some Alien appreciation and this little snippets are definitely good reminders of how awesome the film is.

 

The Idea

  • Watch and discuss movies together (kinda like a book club)
  • "Crowd source" recommendations for not-entirely-new films (IE, older than a year or so, let's say)
  • Aim for generally bettering or curating our film "diet"

How it will work (at least at first)

  • 1 film a month
  • First, a post to take nominations/suggestions
    • Post any film you want to watch, or have heard good things about, or recommend to everyone else
  • Second, a post to take votes on the nominations
  • And then we watch and discuss the winner

First round will start next month (July)

Please share any thoughts/feedback, though we'll likely run this at least once first before making any changes, just to feel it out

 

Not the prettiest graph, but a neat way of putting all this information into one image.

Wiki Commons page: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Generation_timeline.svg#mw-jump-to-license

Wikipedia page on Generations: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation

 

Edit: Here's the exact same clip on the standard YouTube Watch page.

courtesy of zagorath


Brandon Sanderson the fantasy author

For those uninterested in watching a youtube short (sorry), the theory is pretty simple:

COVID and the death of theatres broke the film industry's controlled, simple and effective marketing pipeline (watch movie in theatres -> watch trailer before hand -> watch that tailer's movie in theatres ...) and so now films have the same problems books have always had which is that of finding a way to break through in a saturated market, grab people's attention and find an audience. Not being experienced with this, the film industry is floundering.

In just this clip he doesn't mention streaming and TV (perhaps he does in the full podcast), but that basically contributes to the same dynamic of saturation and noise.

Do note that Sanderson openly admits its a mostly unfounded theory.

For me personally, I'm not sure how effective the theatrical trailers have been in governing my movie watching choices for a long time. Certainly there was a time that they did. But since trailers went online (anyone remember Apple Trailers!?) it's been through YouTube and online spaces like this.

Perhaps that's relatively uncommon? Or perhaps COVID was just the straw that broke the camel's back? Or maybe there's a generational factor where now, compared to 10 years ago, the post X-Gen and "more online" demographic is relatively decisive of TV/Film sales?

view more: next ›