loaExMachina

Assume some people were around you when you froze time. They saw you did something and then were the only one who could move.

Then they went through the absolute nightmare of being paralyzed and conscious for six months. And they know you've caused it.

I highly doubt the whole world concented to this.

Whatever else you did in frozen time barely changes a thing.

He'll die soon or late, that's literally the only prediction that can't possibly be wrong.

Oui SVP, il faut juste que le PS arrête de vouloir péter plus haut que leur cul et acceptent que personne ne veut d'Olivier Faure.

Too many teachers assume if they admit they were wrong, the students will get more insolent, as if sensing weakness. I've briefly been an assistant teacher in a middle school, and I found that on the contrary, students seem to appreciate an earnest admission of mistake and calmly accept the apology. Even some students that would be insolent in other situations. When it's clear you're wrong and the student knows it, pretending you're right won't do any good. Acting in a respectable manner will get you more respect.

Le PS fait chier. Si je parlais au nom d'un des partis, je poserais peut-être Marine Tondelier comme dernier compromis mais je n'irai pas plus à droite (donc en vrai je ne proposerais pas tout de suite Tondelier, j'évoquerai plusieurs candidats plus à gauche avant pour faire avancer les négociations et mettre le PS plus ostensiblement dans la position de ceux qui sont clivant à force de tout refuser)

Il en est évidemment hors de question. Le PS est le bloc du NFP qui inspire le moins confiance en interne, à cause de son histoire de trahisons répétées et de son opposition assumée avec la FI. Je serai pour Huguette Bello. Si le PS ne valide pas, un ou une candidate écolo pourrait être un compromis acceptable. Mais pas Faure.

It systematically ignored the scores of Africans with high IQ

In previous works, he even used outdated methods like skull measuring.

I remember reading it somewhere

Yeah, you probably did, it might be one of the pseudoscience things far-right spread on social media presenting them as facts. Sooner or later, they get relayed by factoid pages that don't know they are far right. One such factoid I've seen around is that red hair (and sometimes also blond hair) were going to become extinct due to race mixing. This is also false, but while a rightwing Facebook page is the first place I saw it, I've seen it repeated by many people with no ties to the right wing, who didn't question it.

Another close example I've seen is the IQ map. It's based on a fraudulous study by Richard Lynn, a segregationist behavolioral scientist. His study was actually published in a reputable journal, but later removed when it was found his numbers were bullshit. He then cofounded his own journal with like-minded people. The thing is, while this map is shared by fascists online, it's rarely contested. I've seen many discussions on Twitter where a racist posted the map, and many leftists were talking about how IQ isn't mostly genetic and that these numbers must be a result of poverty, or some began saying the concept of IQ itself was racist... But no one questioned the numbers, altho they were actually wrong and a quick search coul've shown it.

It is frequent that when in an argument, a statement is presented as a fact and another as a conclusion of that fact, many only try to contradict the conclusion and take the original claim for granted. This tendency is often abused for propaganda purpose.

Imma need a citation for that since these species of rhinos are said to have diverged between 3.3 and 4.1 million years ago and the first known dispersals of homo sapiens out of Africa were 129 to 75 thousand years ago. And migrations and intermixing kept happening throughout prehistory and history. Maybe it comes down to how exactly you define "more separate" ?

Wait, you mean deadlifts aren't about raising the dead?

Merci !

Il n'est pas aussi explicite que Darmanin, qui disait vouloir d'une majorité sans la France Insoumise, mais je crains qu'il veuille dire exactement la même chose. En d'autres termes, il désire une rupture du Nouveau Front Populaire et une nouvelle alliance centriste basée sur la trahison. J'espère que personne à gauche ne mordra à son hameçon. Si quiconque collabore, ils doivent être considérés comme d'infâmes parasites sans intégrité et être à jamais bannis de toute alliance future à gauche.

Tant qu'une telle trahison n'a pas lieu, tout gouvernement qu'il pourrait nommer serait dégommé par une motion de censure; c'est à nous de choisir la musique sur laquelle Macron dansera et pas l'inverse.

Enfin... Il pourrait peut-être avoir une majorité en s'alliant avec le RN... Mais même si je pense que Macron est suffisamment chacalesque pour tenter ça, je ne crois pas que ça passerait. Les fachos sont persuadés que les prochaines présidentielles sont pour eux tant qu'ils gardent leur rôle de parti d'opposition, alors ça ne serait pas dans leur intérêt. Et même dans la majorité présidentielle, je pense qu'il doit y en avoir quelques-uns avec assez d'intégrité pour rejeter une telle alliance.