Wirklich bedenklich finde ich, dass offenbar so schludrig gearbeitet wurde, dass die beiden Bündnisse verwechselt wurden.
Ein Wahllokal bedient knapp 1000 Wähler. Das heißt über den Daumen gepeilt im Schnitt 50 BSW Wähler. Bei 2600 Stimmen wurde falsch Bündnis Deutschland, nicht Wagenknecht gezählt. Also 2,6 pro Wahllokal. Das ist schon erheblich.
Die Stimmen werden doch mehrfach gezählt. Wenn das so eine Diskrepanz auftritt, in wahrscheinlich hunderten Lokalen, dann stimmt da doch was nicht.
Die Regeln sind tatsächlich schwammig. Der "Wählerwille muss erkennbar sein". Was heißt das denn im Einzelfall? Was ist, wenn das Kreuz etwas zu weit oben gemacht wurde? Zählt der Mittelpunkt vom Kreuz? Was ist, wenn das Kreuz so groß ist, dass auch andere Parteien mit erwischt wurden?
Das sind alles Auslegungsfragen.
One might call me apologetic, but I personally feel like paying taxes is not exactly holocausty.
Then again, I don't know any rich people, so maybe I'm just biased.
Trump used to be rather transactional, though.
It's an evil logic, but there was an internal logic behind what he did in his first term. He bullied you into submission, and agreed to a deal if he thought it benefits him (him, not the USA).
Now, he's just on full autodestruct. There's zero logic behind it. Not even chaotic franticness like before, just erratic randomness.
Your comments strengthen my conviction that you read a philosophy book and now try to emulate what you think smart people sound like.
Naja, eigentlich hat jeder schon ein Rad. Oder zumindest so ziemlich jeder.
You might as well argue that healthy people are a drag since care in old age is so expensive.
See, I'm German. We have a solidarity based health insurance (mostly). I'm a young, reasonably healthy guy with a reasonably high income. All in all I pay 840€ every month (that's the maximum amount), even though I cost next to nothing. And I'm okay with that.
Yes, smoking is bad and I don't like smokers. But denying them healthcare is deeply deeply inhumane. And in Germany even unconstitutional.
I'm really confused about his statement.
I mean, let's assume he's right, and let's assume that a vaccine only protects you for, say, 20 years. Just measles induced encephalitis alone has a lethality of 0.1%. How many cases of anything more than a mild fever did any vaccine ever cause? He's not even claiming it's causing autism or death or transformation into Space Godzilla. So why not just vaccinate? It's stupid even in his own world.
That's unfortunately an extremely slippery slope.
If vaccines (or lack thereof) are enough to refuse "service", why treat lung cancer in smokers? What about type 2 diabetes?
Es gibt 1000 Wähler pro Lokal. Steht ganz oben.