gencha

joined 1 year ago
[–] gencha@lemm.ee 15 points 3 hours ago

Drunk people might accidentally get pregnant and help with the population. Really an obvious move

[–] gencha@lemm.ee -3 points 3 hours ago

People who have actually relevant use cases with the need for a reliable partner would never use LE. It's a gimmick for hobbyists and people who suck at their job.

If you have never revoked a certificate, you don't really know what you're doing. If you have never run into rate-limiting issues with LE that block a rollout, you don't know what you're doing.

LE works until it doesn't, and then it's like every other free service on the internet: no guarantees If your setup relies on the goodwill of a single entity handing out shit for free, it's not a robust setup. If you rely on that entity to keep an OCSP responder alive for free so all your consumers can verify the validity of your certificate, that's not great. And people do this to save their company $1 a month for the real thing? Even running the shitty certbot in compute has a larger cost. People are so blindly in love with this "free" garbage. The fanboys will never die off

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And it was a hand blender even. Wow

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 8 points 23 hours ago

Kennst duden Konrad? Weil ist ein Maschine

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago

Especially after the GOP literally pulled her into the spotlight over the subject https://newrepublic.com/post/177990/fox-news-conspiracy-theory-taylor-swift-psyop

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Weird. I was also reminded of him when Vance went donut shopping for lots of glaze. Might be something to it.

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

Maybe he's misunderstood. Maybe another one of his children doesn't agree with him and he wants to get rid of it. He'll take the cat in exchange. A somewhat understandable offer.

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Habe das auch nicht so gemeint, dass man jetzt schon direkt auf die Straße rennen soll 😄

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Nicht irgendwelche Leute. Das ist verboten. Aber jeder Bürger hat das Recht sich gegen Feinde der Verfassung zu wehren. Und Nazis wollen diese Verfassung abschaffen.

Du genießt in dem Land in dem du geboren bist üblicherweise umfangreiche Rechte die Ausländer erstmal nicht bekommen. Das ist für dich ein Vorteil.

Viele Ausländer, besonders Flüchtlinge, wären mit Sicherheit lieber in ihrer Heimat, wenn es dort einigermaßen sicher wäre. Ich habe nichts gegen Menschen die bei uns Zuflucht suchen. Ich erkenne deren Herausforderungen an, und möchte mir diese nicht zumuten weil ein paar Hurensöhne bei uns den dicken Max machen.

Wo sich da bei mir wirklich die Grenze zwischen Flucht und Bürgerkrieg befindet, bleibt aber hoffentlich für immer offen.

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Valid. I've been thinking though. What's the problem with making a waterproof audio jack, if we have the USB C for charging?

I don't want to hate on wireless by any means. I often prefer wireless. But it's really fucking nice to have a power source connected and audio as well. It's very convenient. Especially if you have a dock and headset.

It just feels like such a redundant transformation that achieved nothing for the user.

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know they can still use the chip even if you don't want BT. I know they can still use it regardless of your desire to disable it. If there was no reasonable user demand for it, then it would be pretty hard to sell a useless piece of metal that only eats up energy and space in the phone.

You know, like an audio jack.

No other type of audio device saw the need to have the jack removed. The BT-only headphones were introduced by the same companies who removed the audio jack from the phones.

Nobody is "tricking" anyone. This is just as regular a shady business practice as false advertising. The companies doing this just weigh their options to maximize profits. This is a laughably easy sell, apparently, so it's reasonable they would be doing it. The complaints about this subject were loud from day one. Removing the jack is artificially limiting the features of the device for literally no plausible reason. Point to their material that explains it in more words than "we decided it's time".

We had the entire oil and tobacco industry lie to us for decades, but this is far fetched?

 
view more: next ›