chuckleslord

joined 1 year ago
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

That's why they got sober

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Or, better yet, all golf is moved to digital/putt-putt. No need to waste all that land just to hit a ball.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

I fucking hate when you gotta pilot the Jaeger on your own. I don't remember how necks work.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

But enough talk... Have at you!

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Holy shit! Is that King Koopa?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, all of that, but also the supply of new housing never recovered from 2008 (when all the hedge funds went into buying existing houses versus risking money on new builds).

We need both.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

Hi, I have autism and can tell you that it isn't a "get out of social repercussions for free" card. The comment was still rude and still deserved a call-out, even if the commenter had autism.

Maybe don't use a hypothetical person with a disability to defend your take on a situation.

And again, the word assault here doesn't apply. They were rude, they got that energy back. It's not hard to understand.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago (5 children)

They asked a deeply personal, rude, and misogynistic question in a public space and you want to know if it was in bad faith? I think the clap back was very warranted.

Also, that's not verbal assault, it's just an insult. If she threatened harm or made them feel unsafe, then it would be.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Fascists gotta ~~be punched in the face~~ fash

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (4 children)

They needed him to run to stop a Bernie nomination. So... he kind of was "made to", in that he also agreed that Bernie shouldn't get the nomination.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago

Victim blaming. Classy

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's an anti-joke. Instead of doing a typical setup-payoff, the setup is that it uses the format of a joke, but then subverts the expectation by then having the "characters" make the most basic observations/actions.

view more: next ›