chuckleslord
joined 1 year ago
I saw that episode of Monk
No idea if this is the case here but... people be named after their grandparents.
Wait, that's about Mondale? Oh, yeah, the math checks out, I guess. Mondale was the most milquetoast pick, there was no pull outside of MN. No wonder he had a landslide. How could getting shot three years before have that much of a draw?
Reagan was going to landslide anyways since Carter was slipping. LBJ was leading a popular administration. Using the past in presidential contests to try and predict future ones is laughable, because they're insanely complex, change rapidly from contest to contest, and we have so few data to parse from. Trump isn't going to win because of this, most people still remember his horrible incompetence.
Nope, not gonna happen. No fascist this year, thanks
Dude. This is spam. I've seen this like half a dozen times on any post tangentially related. Knock it off
11 is going to have the most nerding out. I need that in my life, always
I just ran this Google, here's some more info:
So, that sure looks it's talking about the actual bath not the solution. So, yes, it is suggesting a 1-to-1 soap to water in-the-bath mix. LLMs say stupid shit?! Since when?
I can readily admit that it pulled that info from a site about making bubble bath solution, but it doesn't say that in the AI readout.
Cool. The format of this video answers the actual question (How many printers would you need to keep up with a printed edition of Wikipedia) in the first 10 seconds. It then spends the rest of the video asking and answering all of the other questions around that question. Do this on clickbait and not something that fills the time with other interesting things.
It's not even three minutes, who is this advice for?
view more: next ›