First: thank you for providing the article!
But that is not what you claimed earlier. Reuters specifically doesn't claim they are or are not Hezbollah members. Just that they saw videos of hurt people.
Just to make my stand point clear: I don't mean that this attack mostly attacked civilians, I just don't think we are at a level of information yet, where the full broadness of the attack is clear. If it really would be 2 innocent on 3000 hits, then yes, that would a "good" number.
I mean, I didn't like Merkel either, but she wasn't that bad to be warned about.
The question wasn't about the efficacy of dogs but about the "only respond to handler" part and you didn't provide a source for that.
Edit: another comment provided a study for that.
Wie immer bei "das ist doch klar" Themen ist es trotzdem wichtig, das man mal mit wissenschaftlichen Methoden und Genauigkeit das ganze sich anguckt.
Und ist es nicht ein schönes Gefühl sagen zu können: es ist wissenschaftlich erwiesen, das Rassisten dumm sind? Ü
Can you give me a link to articles from the journalists on the ground please, I'm not doubting you, I just haven't seen them myself yet. I only saw articles which reference officials from both sides (which doesn't really mean anything between Hezbollah and Israel)
That the other 3000 hits are Hezbollah people is said by the Israel army, which is not exactly known for being truthful regarding non israelian civilian casualties, to say it in a neutral way.
The kids are especially put in the foreground of the discussion because they are definitely innocent. For any regular middle age man? Fat chance when the IDF even says schools and hospitals are terrorist buildings. They just call them terrorist, because they only kill terrorist. You got killed? Means you were a terrorist.
Every fairy tale with a good king/queen/princess/prince?
Or One Thousand and One Nights has the king killing his wifes left and right, but by the end it's alright, because he really loves his current wife now...
Since you are asking for cautionary tales, The Fisherman and his Wife might a better fit. Just be glad of what you have and don't strive for advancing.
Ah, mir kam es so vor, als ob das auch eine Referenz auf ein altes Bild wäre.
This is as little civilian casualties as possible for you? I disagree with that evaluation.
Nah, I would say pretty much same idea of disregarding civilian life.
So you see Israel also as terrorist club now?
Wenn dir der (erste Teil des) Kommentar gefallen würde, wärst du ein schlechter Mensch.
Ah, you meant the polish side. Agreed there.