I forgor. This is the post I was referring to. It’s well-researched and quite fascinating, actually.
QuaternionsRock
The big one is task (thread) isolation. Let me dig up some sources and get back to you,
It’s also objectively less secure than Chromium, which is hard to admit.
Turns out IBM is three hot messes in a trenchcoat and always has been.
International, business, and machines?
Because Microsoft cares so much about an 18.6K-member community called “linuxmemes” on a small federated Reddit alternative known for being filled with die-hard Linux fans and furries?
No it’s just R^7 regression! Testosterone levels will be negative by next week!
Edit: and male bodies were approximately 2000% testosterone in the 1940s!
If you count it is as a 20$ a month movie ticket, you could pledge/buy a Hammerhead in around 2 years.
Jesus Christ lmao
Yeah man, I could enjoy a Blu-ray of my favorite movie for a comparable amount of time but that wouldn’t make me any less of a moron to buy a $400 Blu-ray.
I’ve never really thought about this before, but const volatile
value types don’t really make sense, do they? const volatile
pointers make sense, since const
pointers can point to non-const
values, but const
values are typically placed in read-only memory, in which case the volatile
is kind of meaningless, no?
Again, you’ve identified a problem with the current implementation of patent law, not patents themselves.
This allows capital to exercise power over it and profit through it
Of course it does… patent law as it stands goes hand-in-hand with capitalist economic systems. Patents are intended to incentivize investing in ideas. (That’s a lot of ‘i’s!)
On the other hand, people who come up with ideas are workers, too, and a system devoid of any means to discourage/prevent parasitic engagement—wherein others reap the rewards of these workers’ labor—doesn’t seem like the opposite of capitalism, either.
Edit: To be clear, I think current regulations need improvement, and am in no way defending patent trolls. If the intend goal of patent law does not align with its observed ramifications, the law should be changed.
It’s both. Patents are just a legal tool, and can be used and/or abused as the imperfect regulations allow.
hmmm