PoTayToes

Jewish people on Sabbat vibes.

Antisemitism has one specific definition, which is the hatred of Jews.

Please don't use an etymological fallacy often used by antisemites ("It's not antisemitism, I'm not calling for the death of Palestinians" is an actual thing I've seen). Also as yesman said, "Semites" is indeed race science, which should not be used as if it has any kind of validity whatsoever.

I literally gave you a link from the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting, the national iranian broadcaster, whose head is appointed by Khamenei directly. If it is a wrong translation, they were the ones that made it. And by reading your own link, do you really give any presumption of innocence to someone who speaks at a Holocaust Denial Conference??

Plus what internal consumption. If you say out loud "this country should not exist anymore" with a history of threats against that country, you should not get nuclear weapons. You can't justify this because you were speaking to extremist elements inside your country. If anything that's a counterargument.

could also quote a lot of radical garbage from Bush or other worse nutjobs in the US

I don't think the US deserves nuclear weapons either for that matter. Bush is a war criminal like Khameini is and I'd have them trialed decades ago if I had any say about it.

Israel is basically a failed state. The only solution now is a 1 state solution for Palestine-Israel after a period of “de-nazification” of Israel.

Yes, this is a pretty good example of someone having a different opinion than me. On the contrary of what you say, I can indeed picture you as a human being with your own thoughts and ideas and family that you love. But your opinion is as true as the Catholic Church's (also made of real people) was on heliocentrism.

I see you aren't engaging most of my comment. That's fine, hopefully it made you think at least.

peaceful use

You can't claim things like "Israel must be wiped off the map" (Iranian source before you continue with the propaganda accusations) and pretend you are enriching uranium over the needed amount for civilian use for peaceful purposes.

Iraq and WMDs

No argument here, that's just America doing American things. I'd have Bush and his whole admin at the Hague if it was up to me. Not that Saddam deserved better, but the Iraqi did.

Last paragraph.

And you're right, Iran has a right to defend themselves. But they aren't defending themselves in this situation. You don't defend yourself by having a proxy invade then another take control of a country so you can have it lob missiles at a third one without endangering yourself.

Is it simply impossible for you to imagine that other peoples have different opinions and viewpoints on things?

There are an infinity of viewpoints, and many (most?) of them will be wrong.

• "Lebanon, Iran and the Palestinians can defend themselves" is not wrong.
• "Lebanon and Iran are currently defending themselves" is wrong.

Lebanon isn't even included in this, Hezbollah is not Lebanon. Iran is attacking Israel. They could stop doing that anytime and have Israel leave them alone. That includes giving up on their uranium enrichment.

Palestinians are a much more complicated situation, because the settler land theft is agression from Israel and should have stopped decades ago. But the current Palestinian leaders (both Hamas and Fatah) don't actually care to solve that. They would rather have their citizens continue to die so they can continue getting richer. Which is why they encourage deadly attacks on civilian which will keep Netanyahu and his ilk in power, because Israelis like all humans tend to respond to violence with violence.

These are human beings sick of imperialist aggression.

Bullshit. How can you be so blind? Iran is led by right-wing theocrats leaders, they would be imperialist themselves if they could afford to. Actually they are, since they supported Syria when it fucking invaded Lebanon for 30 years. And then left Hezbollah to continue controlling the place, where it has more influence than the actual Lebanese governement, which is supposed to represent the Lebanese people.

Hezbollah does not act in the interest of the Lebanese people, they are murderous thugs that obey their masters in Tehran. If they truly wanted to help Lebanese people, they would not be shooting at Israel. There are so many things in terrible shape in Lebanon they could be fixing, but no, they are a large part of the problem because they want control over making things better.

I'm sorry, but even if this isn't new, I find it completely insane. Like, mind-blowing. Damn.

Heard something about where you can do dungeons solo-party? I think that was gw2.

"Dungeons" as a general term is understood to be "group content".

In GW2, these are:

• Dungeons, which you go through with the Core (base game) story, then are available as a max level (don't worry, you get there fast) content with 3/4 different paths each. They are made so you go through with 5 people. There's a LFG system which (while ugly,) works and if you don't find one you can just put up a group yourself with the title "Ascalon Catacombs - Story Mode" or "Caudecus Manor - 1st Path (or P1)", and it should fill up pretty fast. However, once you have enough mastery over your character, you should be able to solo them. I don't recommend expecting to be able to solo them easily right off the bat, however.
• Fractals, which are also 5-men content, and are accessible from max level. Those go in difficulty degrees from 1 to 100, and also have a LFG section dedicated to them. Like Dungeons, you could I guess solo them, however this gets harder the higher level you go, and I honestly consider people who can solo the higher levels as madmen.
• Strikes are 10-men content, and are shorter (one boss) events, and go from easy to hard content to go through. They are usually considered end-game content already. With 10 people. I suppose some of the easier ones are soloable, but that seems like an absolute slog to me and very un-fun. A few of them have challenge modes for the challenge-addicted.
• Raids are older content (though they are bringing back a new one in the current expac) which are the highest level of difficulty available of content (though the challenge strikes are harder than some raids, iirc). Those are harder to get into because of the smaller population of dedicated players, you usually need to find a raiding guild to get some training runs in so you can then find a regular roster. I'm honestly not sure how it is nowadays, but my experience with them is limited because I did not enjoy that difficulty level.
• Group Instances are 50-men content, limited in number but generally accessible in difficulty. You just generally pop up at the entry spot whenever it is time for the public entry, then get randomly assigned to an instance completing it (although you can find specialized squads doing them if you look). Those are not soloable, but you don't need to speak with anyone as people generally know what they have to do and manage to get through.
• I guess World Bosses count also? Those are open world, so just be there a bit before the event starts and you'll have enough people waiting to do them on the map, so while again they are not "solo", you don't actually need to talk to anyone to get your fill of content.

I remember trying Guild Wars 2 and thinking every other player might as well just be a bot because nobody interacted. :(

I'm sorry that was your experience, but this is very much opposite of mine. Not only is the game still going strong (new expac came out like two weeks ago btw, and it's pretty good!), but in all my years playing (and that's been since Day 1), I've had so many fun interactions in the game.

And that's without even counting the ones with my guilds. I've even had some fun chats in ranked PvP, the saltiest place in the game. I'm playing in European servers, which probably doesn't change much versus NA, but yeah, there are often conversations going on in map chat, or locally, between total strangers. Also between teams in WvW, during events, during festivals, waiting at the Wall after the Chak Gerent...

It's a very friendly community and I encourage you to give it another try! And yeah, if you can find a guild suited to your tastes it's even better!

I'm glad people like that guy exist

Sorry for the delayed answer.

I fail to see how using OpenSecrets is a problem. Be it private donors or foreign groups/governements, all the money is (officially) there, is that not so?

Because in the comment you are answering to, the comparisons are done also against groups funded by private donors. Which should also not be registered under the act. And again, those other groups massively outspend the pro-Israel ones.

What other foreign nation lobbying group donates $14M to the opponent of a congressman and pays for attack ads against him to hurt his chances in an upcoming election? It’s unprecedented.

I have honestly no idea? But from my understanding, any other random lobbying group could also do the same, if they had an interest into it. Hell, maybe they do already but there has been no reporting on it because it's less interesting if it's the NRA or Lockheed-Martin?

You are correct though, I did indeed not watch it. Hence I misunderstood the comment I was answering to as being negative towards Signal. Thanks for the added context.

Tell me though, which company will not hand over what data they have when asked by their country's judiciary?

The question here is how much data they keep. Strict legal minimum or more.