NateNate60

joined 10 months ago
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 points 30 minutes ago

The Wall Street Journal editorial board is pretty notorious for writing this sort of drivel on their opinion pages

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 3 points 32 minutes ago

I really had to run a fact check on this but it really does seem to be true.

Brains are 0.5% plastic by weight and with an average human brain mass of 1.3 kg, that means humans, on average, have 6.5 g of plastic in their brain

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Your heart is in the right place but this isn't TikTok

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

No, of course not. He shouldn't have broken the law. That will always remain wrong, and it must be if we want to enjoy an orderly rule-based society.

But at the same time... I'm glad it happened.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

America doing something wrong doesn't mean it's okay for other countries to do that thing as well.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (6 children)

This is a legitimate concern, but I also question Mexico's ability to adhere to those standards and administer justice correctly when El Chapo managed to give them the slip twice, even while under "maximum security".

People suspect that this argument is not being made by Mexican authorities in good faith, and it is easy to understand why people think that.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What people need and what people irrationally want can be two different things

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For what it's worth, English Wikipedia editors reached a consensus to deprecate (ban) it for unrealiability last year: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_424#RFC:_The_Cradle

The following notes are present:

The Cradle is an online magazine focusing on West Asia/Middle East-related topics. It was deprecated in the 2024 RfC due to a history of publishing conspiracy theories and wide referencing of other deprecated sources while doing so. Editors consider The Cradle to have a poor reputation for fact-checking.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is kind of what people are missing. These people really do produce millions of dollars worth of labour. That's how entertainers are paid; the more people want to see their performance, the more that performance is worth.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yes, that's why it's "Outbursts of Everett True", not "reasonable reactions of Everett True". He is an asshole and proud of it.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

Those last three words of the headline are doing some heavy lifting here

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

They're talking about ag-gag laws. When people take pictures of the poor conditions on farms and it causes public outrage, the farm tends to lose business so some states have passed laws to protect the farmers.

 

and every fifth digit is just put in an odd place

 

The jump in distro versions, say, from Fedora 38 to Fedora 39, is not the same as the jump from Windows 10 to Windows 11. It's more like the jump from version 23H2 to 24H2.

Now, I'm sure even most Windows users among those reading will ask "wtf are 23H2 and 24H2"? The answer is that those version numbers are the Windows analogue to the "23.10" at the end of "Ubuntu 23.10". But the difference is that this distinction is invisible to Windows users.

Why?

Linux distros present these as "operating system upgrades", which makes it seem like you're moving from two different and incompatible operating systems. Windows calls them "feature updates". They're presented as a big deal in Linux, whereas on Windows, it's just an unusually large update.

This has the effect of making it seem like Linux is constantly breaking software and that you need to move to a completely different OS every six to nine months, which is completely false. While that might've been true in the past, it is increasingly true today that anything that will run on, say, Ubuntu 22.04 can also run without modification (except maybe for hardcoded version checks/repository names) on Ubuntu 23.10, and will still probably work on Ubuntu 24.04. It's not guaranteed, but neither is it on Windows, and the odds are very good either way.

I will end on the remark that for many distros, a version upgrade is implemented as nothing more than changing the repositories and then downloading the new versions of all the packages present and running a few scripts. The only relevant changes (from the user's perspective) is usually the implementation of new features and maybe a few changes to the UI. In other words, "feature update" describes it perfectly.

 

Still just plain rectangles with text.

view more: next ›