Yeah, TED as far as know invites you to present, TEDx you pay for a platform to talk on... which shows how much people value your message.
Laser
I don't want to argue against the concept and actually believe that the amount paid here is too low. What I tried to point out is that determining a good amount is difficult and arguing with work makes the matter more complicated.
The more pressing issue would be to make child daycare actually available.
#1 Bestselling Author of The Six Habits
Notice how Bestselling refers to author, not the book, and with her probably being the only author, she can prefix it with any superlative she wants.
CEO of Vision Advertising
Imagine calling yourself CEO unironically for the maybe 3 person gig you're running to have some overpaid management fill their calenders with instead of doing actual work.
TEDx Speaker
This is not the flex you (edit: she) think(s) it is
America's Happiness Coach
Complains about other travelers... preemptively.
men can keep doing crotchspawn when they are old.
But if women can't, why would there be need for sterilization?
I know you're probably right, just trying to point out the absurdity.
You're both right and wrong in my opinion. Children take to as much time as a job, for sure, and probably more. But if you consider it work to bring them to and watch them at a football / soccer match on the weekend that you should be reimbursed for by the public, you maybe shouldn't have kids to begin with. You (hopefully) don't have kids because you feel obligated by society, but because you want them.
It needs to strike a balance where this is accounted for.
South Korea, Japan, Germany, and many other countries "grappling" with decreasing birth-rates have to consider paying parents for children. They are a full-time job.
"Kindergeld" has been a thing in Germany since a very long time, and it's per child. Does it pay like a full job? No... but parents do get paid.
Die Posts sind nicht anonym, sondern pseudonym. Bedeutet auch, jemand kann zu Pseudonymen ein Profil erstellen und ggf. auf eine Person "matchen".
Mit der gleichen Argumentation könnte man auch Vorratsdatenspeicherung durchbringen. Die IP ist ja kein Name, auch wenn die Zuordnung leichter ist.
Right? It doesn't even make sense for their own world view. I kind of suspect a translation mistake, but then again there seems to be no limit to conservative idiocy.
The only way it makes sense is to create an environment where women out of FOMO Mary and give birth early.
Also imagine asking the same thing for men lol these people would lose their mind. But that's just the usual hypocrisy
And why would they
What does she have to complain? He even got fancy-dressed for this periscope lunch
Or better, not team-based ones.
I don't mind losing 50% of the time. It's the toxicity
Oh yes, of course this was pure misogyny. Plain and simple