ComradePorkRoll

joined 1 year ago
[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Aren't those the same thing?

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

You've got a point. This can be a sign of something sinister. It's not necessarily a bad a sign but the situation that the previous user pointed out happens frequently enough that it could be.

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I really don't get why someone would do this other than to play out some sort of sick fantasy. No one good ever destroys public utilities.

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

The purpose of a system is what it does.

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I'm aware that's how they work but when the system "works" and the result is starving families then maybe it's time we rethink whether we should keep following this system, no?

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I love that we need ironclad proof to decide whether or not it's okay for people to be able to afford sustenance or not. If there's no proof then, oh well! The poors will just have to make do.

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I choose to believe the person that gave you 1 will bump into you again and say "now we're talking" before disappearing into a crowd.

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

He's making use of his depends.

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

It's really hard to take the "law" seriously when we constantly see rich people getting away with violating it.

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Syndicalism is the only way.

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Wouldn't it have been hilarious if that's what happened after the fact?

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

They take us for fools.

view more: next ›