Comment105

It means I open the site, and I can't read the article because it had some obligatory signup.

Granted, this was on mobile. On desktop it seems I can read it.

If the USA doesn't stand for freedom and democracy, then it stands for nothing at all.

I don't care.

The site doesn't want readers, I'm gonna go back to reading memes.

People largely don't deserve democracy. They tend to choose kings, so long as they don't remember being ruled by one.

It's basically "Ok Taylor. You forced my hand, I'll give you what you want. If my sperm is the only thing that can get you on team Trump, then so be it. Have my sperm."

Not sure why he thinks Taylor Swift wants a little MG 34 Stürmer xXx. He's gone a bit mad.

Shhhh! Let us imagine it could be a success when it finally launches.

Because you aren't allowed medically assisted suicide. The democratic government mandates a rough and tough death for you, because a merciful death is too awful for a fucking voter to think any more on than " Oh no, no death please. I don't want to talk about this anymore, go away or I call the police."

It's not what you wanted to say, but it is what the words you wrote effectively meant.

Nature doesn't lend you credibility. You and your colleagues read Nature because it's how you filter out the trash.
Researchers agree to have it that way. I will not yield on that argument. You do, you agree to it by majority to this day.

So they are the source of your credibility. And you continue to agree to have it that way.

Why publish through a journal at all? What do they do that WordPress doesn't? Are they the source of your credibility? Do they pay the peer reviewers. Or are you all just whipped?

If you're looking at publishing it for free, I'd think it should be fine to put a PDF download in an ordinary blog post with the title and abstract?

Or are there people who won't allow that?