Sowas funktioniert aber nur, wenn sich alle an die Regeln halten. Vor allem muss es dann auch Reziprozität geben. Von 'Open Science' will China meist nur dann etwas wissen, wenn es um ausländische Forschung geht. Bei eigenen wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten hat die chinesische Regierung eine ganz andere Sichtweise, da will man von 'open' meist nichts wissen. Ich habe das in Thread schon gepostet, aber hier passt es nochmal: Open Science Investigation
0x815
Ja, da gibt es sehr viel Grund zur Sorge, wie man u.a. auch an der China Science Investigation einer Rechercheplattform sieht.
This is, at least to a large part, Russian propaganda. The regime needs to create an enemy for covering up its own incompetence, find a reason to start a war, and sending the country's citizens to the meat grinder. But the 'elite' is enjoying Western lifestyle and sometimes even their 'golden passports'. Many live in the West if and when they are not (yet) sanctioned. And while schools at home are becoming more and more indoctrination camps, the political elite and the oligarchs send their own children to Western schools and universities (one of Putin's daughters lives in Paris, France, as media have reported these days, for example).
This is not very illuminating as 'talks' are almost the norm, especially if a company has filed for bankruptcy protection. They can almost not not talk.
Whether they really engage in a closer partnership is a different question altogether. If so, it would not be good for Northvolt in the long run imo.
Georgescu’s unexpected gains are partly linked to his social media strategy. He has used platforms like TikTok effectively to sway voter opinion and spread propaganda. However, allegations that his campaign is using fake accounts to fabricate comments and manipulate social media activity have also surfaced [...]
Georgescu [...] praised Romania’s former dictator and Nazi ally during the second world war, Marshal Ion Antonescu, referring to him as a “martyr” who also did “good deeds”. [...] He has also positioned himself as pro-Putin, praising the Russian president as one of the world’s few “true leaders”. He has criticised Romania’s support for Ukraine, claiming that Nato would not defend Romania if it were attacked. And he advocates for nationalist policies, aiming to reduce Romania’s reliance on imports and distance the country from the EU [...]
His TikTok account, which was set up in 2022, has more than 400,000 followers and millions of views. Numerous accounts, groups and pages in his support have also proliferated on Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter) [...]
He has also claimed in interviews that women are incapable of leading Romania, and that feminism is “absolute dirt”. In one video, he declared that “only a man can do this”, referring to the presidency. These videos come not only from Georgescu’s official TikTok accounts, but also from unaffiliated accounts using his name in profiles or bios to promote his election [...]
These clips [on Tiktok] often rely on emotional appeals and misinformation [...]
During Georgescu’s campaign, accounts displaying bot-like behaviours have been highly active in the comment sections on TikTok, YouTube and Facebook [...]
Using bots to inflate a candidate’s social media popularity and spread misinformation is a tactic that has been used to influence elections elsewhere before [...]
Reports suggest that thousands of fake accounts promoted Georgescu through videos and comments prior to Romania’s election [...]
Valérie Hayer, a top EU lawmaker, has now called on TikTok’s CEO to appear before the European Parliament and address the platform’s possible misuse in favour of Georgescu’s campaign.
@bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com Yah, I forget surveillance algorithms are only bad when they come from the West, right? (/s, just to be safe)
In other related news:
Romania orders election recount after TikTok bias claims
A recount of the votes cast in Sunday's first round of presidential elections in Romania has been ordered by the country's top court following allegations that social media platform TikTok gave "preferential treatment" to the surprise winner, Calin Georgescu.
... with social media as an innocent bystander just concidentally being there ...
Social media - and Tiktok is no exemption, of course - is not an "innocent bystander". Their algorithms deliberately surveill and manipulate users, and pursue a commercial and/or political agenda. In case of Tiktok, this agenda serves the goal of the regime in China (and their allies).
There is ample evidence for Tiktok and (almost) all other social media platforms pursuing a purpose. For the Romanian election case, there is an analysis by the European Media Observatory on the Romanian election -- (Archived link).
On 'TikTok's role in Romanian politics' and the 'Candidate Performance Metrics', it says, among others:
- Călin Georgescu: Notably surged in popularity, garnering 120 million views, particularly in the final two months. This increase was attributed to coordinated campaigns that used both direct promotion and indirect influence via unpaid influencers, often lacking appropriate labeling. A salient example is the #echilibrușiverticalitate campaign, which reached 2.4 million views through these tactics.
The analysis also says:
The lack of effective moderation allowed for widespread dissemination of unverified information, particularly affecting extreme-right candidates.
Concerns around unlabelled or undeclared political content in the 2024 Romanian presidential elections, particularly on TikTok are significant. They emphasize a lack of transparency in political campaigns, notably involving candidates like Călin Georgescu, who used the platform without disclosing the funding and motivations behind their promotion. The employment of influencers without adequate disclosure raises ethical issues complicates voters’ understanding of the content.
[...]
The notable gap between projected poll figures (around 10%) and actual results (over 22%) raises concerns about potential external influences, including foreign interference.
Emphasis mine.
[Edit typo.]
Yeah, there are many FOSS organizations in the U.S. like the Open Source Lab by the Oregon State University, the Open Source Software Institute, and many others. I guess they could do it, possibly if some join forces.
I agree in principal with that view, but there was pressure from VW's top investors (Union Investment, Deka) to clarify the situation in Xinjiang. An audit turned out to be extremely flawed which put further pressure on the management. It's hard to tell how much this contributed to the decision, but at least some shareholders weren't indifferent about the situation.
The Asia Times is based in Hong Kong in the meantime, so the Chinese government will have a close hold on what they publish. That's why I'd agree with what others already said to not trust them to much ...
Just fyi: China does have its own national carbon trading scheme, but it appears to be as ineffective as those in the West.
I think we must help those Russians who openly speak out against Putin's regime and the war in the Ukraine, there are many.