this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4563 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

One example, from just up the Ivy-garlanded I-95, at Brown University, was announced just hours before Shafik again called in the police. Brown’s governing body agreed to vote on a proposal that would divest the school’s endowment of companies affiliated with Israel in a meeting in October. The proposal is based on a 2020 Advisory Committee on Corporation Responsibility in Investment Practices that identified and recommended divestment from “companies that facilitate the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory,” per the Brown Daily Herald.

In exchange, the university’s nonviolent student protesters agreed to vacate their encampment by 5 p.m. that afternoon.

...

Another plausible outcome from California: When a similar encampment went up a few days ago at the University of California, Irvine, it seemed likely that police might sweep the protesters away. Orange County sheriff’s deputies began to appear in riot gear near the protest.

But, rather than traffic in vague allegations of misconduct before hiding behind a belligerent mayor and an aggressive police force, like Shafik, the UC–Irvine administration took a much different tack. “UC Irvine respects the rights of any students to engage in free speech and expression including lawful protest,” the school said in a prepared statement. This, remember, is at a public school, where keeping public police forces away is more challenging than a private enclave like Columbia.

And in fact, Irvine’s mayor did get involved in the action. Not long after that, Mayor Farrah N. Khan issued a resounding statement declaring that she would not tolerate any violation of students’ free speech or right to assembly. “I am asking our law enforcement to stand down. I will not tolerate any violations to our students’ rights to peacefully assemble and protest.” She asked the deputies to leave, and they did.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240502114414/https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/05/columbia-student-protests-nypd-shafik-escalation.html

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grobmobularb@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Cops love to beat up people protesting genocide but they won’t run into a classroom of kids being murdered because they’re too afraid.

[–] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Maybe the solution is to have peaceful armed demonstrators 🤔

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Worked for the Black Panthers

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

Well... right up until it didn't.

But I can't help thinking a parade of armed college students marching through the quad could change a lot of views on the 2A very quickly.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There hasn’t been a school shooting in NYC in decades. Kids know the NYPD is not afraid to shoot them. They’re bullies with badges.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

There hasn’t been a school shooting in NYC in decades.

Police increases presence near Manhattan schools in wake of 3 recent shootings

~ Wednesday, March 15, 2023

That suspect, 19-year-old Cheick Coulibaly, faces several charges, including attempted murder, after police say he shot a 17-year-old student multiple times near 68th and Amsterdam. Police say the suspect, believed to be a former classmate of the victim, has three prior arrests, including two arrests for narcotics in 2023.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

Can't help but wonder what would happen if Columbia's students were armed.

I know there's a guy who said something about this once, a long time ago. German fellow with a big beard. Wrote a few economics texts. Gah, it escapes me.

[–] ZK686@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh brother, here we go... let us know when you're going to join your local police department and show those cops how it's supposed to be done!

[–] Grobmobularb@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] ZK686@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

Then just sit there and enjoy your life tough guy. There's people literally dying to be part of this country... you're part of this "cops suck" movement who have no idea just how good you have it.

[–] ZK686@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

How can you say " brutalizing" with a straight face? These kids are fucking protesting something that has NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM. They WILL NOT change the issue with Israel and Palestine. It's been an on-going religious war for years. Do they really think Israel leaders are like "hey, some kid at Columbia wants us to stop...pull back!" I mean, it's ridiculous. They are inconveniencing EVERYONE else for a cause that will have no effect on their lives. Campuses have the right to forcefully remove these people. They are giving them more than enough time and warnings to leave...

[–] tearsintherain@leminal.space 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Folks, to sum up this poster: Basically anyone protesting is irrational and stupid.

(I am getting right wingnut republican, maybe even Q anon, vibes)

[–] ZK686@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No, I think protesting is good, I support protesting many things.: Housing crisis, student loans, I'm pro-choice, so I support protesting the right to abortion for women, protest all you want if it's going to help Americans...I just think it's ridiculous to protest something that can't benefit them in any way. Why aren't these kids protesting in masses all over campuses for lower housing? Better health insurance? Lower gas prices? This Israel/Palestine conflict is beyond a bunch of middle class kids holding up signs about religious conflicts in another part of the world.... it's much deeper.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"You should only protest for things that directly benefit yourself."

You have to love conservative ideology. I love how open you are about it.

[–] ZK686@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do you REALLY think Israel leaders are saying "stop everything, there's some kid at Colombia University protesting!" It's ridiculous.....choose your battles. Boycott, protest, and scream about things that are not fair for YOU and how you want change in YOUR country... not for other people in other countries that your protesting will have ZERO effect on.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah..., these protests aren't trying to stop Israel directly. They're trying to effect US policy. Israel would care about the US giving them less money or less support. They would be bombed to hell without the US. They're trying to effect our country, which effects other countries.

[–] ZK686@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

Again, do they REALLY think this will help US policy? I mean, this country is doing shit behind the scenes to protect itself...the US is constantly under threat because so many other countries hate us... let's not be naive.

[–] FractalsInfinite@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

But it does matter. The US backs Isreals Genocide and is the one supporting there iron dome systems. Affecting public sentiment via protesting would make the US politicians less willing to send money to Isreal. That would influence the outcome.

[–] ZK686@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I hope you really don't believe this. The US will always support Israel, it's literally a matter of national security. There are bigger things at risk by not supporting Israel. Without US support, Israel would literally fall into "survival mode." It would probably wipe out all of Gaza and get rid of the Palestinians just to be on the safe side. If left unprotected, the entire Middle East would attack Israel, possibly created a 3rd World War. If the US wasn't their main support system, they'd turn to someone else, like China or Russia, who would then be their primary source for protection. What the protestors don't understand, is that the US doesn't give foreign aid out of the goodness of our hearts. If it's not good for America we don't do it. Every penny comes with strings attached. If we stop supporting Israel we will no longer have a seat at the table and leverage, among other benefits for the US. This is much more than just the Israel/Palestine conflict.

[–] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 0 points 4 months ago

How was that not your first comment instead of that horrible first comment? This is a very nuanced view on the topic i didn't expect from someone that said "the US has nothing to do with the war in Gaza".

I'm not a USA citizen so I won't comment on the rest.