this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9618 readers
745 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That probably has something to do with the fact that the M1 Abrams was not intended as an overpriced status object designed purely to make spoilt and privileged suburbanites make themselves feel superior to anyone walking in the street.

[–] redthings@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, giant trucks are also designed to be exempted from emissions standards

[–] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] outsideno1877@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Its still objectively true the reason suvs and trucks are so common isn’t how good they are or anything its marketing from manufacturers to make more money from selling cars that avoid emissions standards aka SUVS and “light” trucks

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

To make matters worse; lots of the trucks listed that I see on the roads have aftermarket larger "off road" tires and lift kits, making them a good 12+ inches taller than stock.

And of course, I see them hauling stuff in the bed or on a trailer about 20% of the time at most. But gawd damnit, they're exercising their rahhts!!

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

making them a good 12+ inches taller than stock.

and much safer and more fuel efficient.

wait a moment... it makes a shitwagon EVEN worse handling and more gas guzzling?

Holy shit batman, it's almost as if the owners of these shitwagons are giant assholes

[–] schwim@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's obvious that whoever made that has never looked through any of the portals on an M1A1.

[–] Hupf@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago

Or a char Leclerc for that matter. Look into the abyss of those cruel, spiteful eyes.

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago

"Power Wagon" Who named these, some 5yo? What about the "Cool Machine", " Fast Cruiser", "Speed Demon"? You can have those for 20%.

[–] profdc9@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Is there actually a port or camera on the tank that can see from that angle? The tank doesn't have a windscreen.

[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This chart is confusing. Are these kids all different heights?!

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

same heights, the measures on the kids are their distances to the bumper

[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Also, now that I'm looking more... Those would be some giant 5 year old kids

[–] 7eter@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago

... 4 m - 3 yo enters the room