this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
74 points (83.6% liked)

Linux

5278 readers
438 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 79 points 4 months ago (3 children)

So? Does it need more? Seems to be doing just fine.

Not sure why people think the linux foundation should only do the kernel, it supports a wide variety of open source projects.

[–] Whooping_Seal@sh.itjust.works 59 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The foundation supports a bunch of other open source projects, after all there is a lot more to devices that run the Linux kernel then just the kernel.

Also, I found it a but funny that the foundation created the PDF using Adobe InDesign 19.4 (Windows), according to the metadata in file posted on their website. (original | archive of the PDF)

[–] wasabi 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Looking at the member list it seems like the foundation is supported by companies that probably only care for Linux as a server platform.

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Is this the rage baiting flavour of the month? Is the next step complaining that they spent it all on "the rainbow people"? The Linux Foundation supports lots of open source projects and 8 million dollars on kernel development alone is a lot.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago

They support new endeavors instead of what matters. They don't support all of the random small projects that are critical for operations.

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What features do you personally think they should add?

To bring that figure up

You do realise you can't just throw more features at the kernel right?

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago

You do realise you can’t just throw more features at the kernel right?

Kernel maintainers are burning out. Wouldn't call that a feature, would you?

Linux doesn't support tons of hardware - especially mobile. Linux doesn't have job openings for devs from anywhere on the planet, nor are there any open positions for trainees or juniors.

Imagine if you could begin your career (not hobby) working on linux. The expertise in Linux would be much greater.

Imagine if the Linux Foundation did lobbying to get Linux as a default on hardware. People would grow up using Linux instead of first Windows or Mac before switching to Linux.

There is a lot more than just kernel work and 3rd party projects that happen to run on linux.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 11 points 4 months ago

This linked chart image and more can be found on the financial report https://www.linuxfoundation.org/hubfs/Reports/lf_annualreport23_071024a.pdf?hsLang=en at page 158 (number right bottom of each page), under section Revenue and expenditures.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 months ago

They could support useful projects gasps

[–] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

What does "Project support" means? To support all their projects or just LF?

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 months ago

Lf has a lot of sub projects, like their awesome CNCF for example.

It's all in the linked pdf.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 4 months ago

Nice to see the 13M into community trolling

[–] alk@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Regarding the poor font rendering of this image, they should spend a bit on Linux kerning.

[–] Successful_Try543 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] alk@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

It was a joke on kernel/kerning 🤷