this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26012 readers
1947 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Even from people that never lived in a communist state

edit: im 17 and i hate communism

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Lemmy, the social network, started off as a leftist hangout spot.

From the perspective of "Open Source developers who are anti-Reddit pro-Fediverse", it makes a lot of sense for Leftist/Communist and anti-corporation leaning people to hang out.

After all, the more extreme the viewpoint, the more driven to action (ie: write tens-of-thousands of lines of code and release for free) people get. In some regards, its the nature of Open Source + volunteer effort to attract a more extreme ideology. IE: Free Software is driven by ideology, not by money. So you get ideological people, especially when the software is small and niche.

The July 2023 Reddit Blackout was a big challenge for Lemmy's old community and the new community, as the new community basically "invaded" a large scale leftist hangout spot. But hopefully we all learn to work together and the nature of our neighbors moving forward.

I think anyone here (likely everyone?) is at least on the anti-corporate anti-Reddit side of the discussion. Which is enough of an alliance to keep us together, for now.


It does mean that we'll have to keep up with the far-left old-timers on this network who wish to push their viewpoints. But they are the legacy and the start of Lemmy in some respects, even as the hypergrowth (starting in July 2023) has moderated the community pretty severely.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don’t see the problem with people having communist views…capitalism isn’t great.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, the problem is that you have instances like Hexbear and Lemmy.ml that tread more into tankie territory, where if you argue anything less than the complete annihilation of the West and hail China, you're likely to get harassed. I think rational people can agree that there's a pretty gap between "The current system is corrupt" and "anyone who thinks differently than me should die,' but I've seen plenty of irrational leftists.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, I don't have much problem with people disagreeing with me. But I'm pretty openly pro-capitalist, though I'm not a dumbass libertarian.

I recognize the need for the "capitalist edge cases" (externalities, monopolies, etc. etc.) that must be regulated and fixed for the system to work. I also recognize that we've failed to regulate externalities (ex: CO2 emissions), and failed to regulate monopolies / anticompetitive behavior (see Google).

So I'm a "capitalism works, but only if we work to make it work" kind of person. I think at the moment, Reddit and many other social networks are falling into the well known and well studied failures of raw capitalism, but somehow today's society has forgotten all the 1910s era solutions that we did (ex: Jungle, etc. etc.) where we regulated the hell out of the shitty behavior and fixed the most blatant problems, for the better of America.

We just gotta do the same thing today.


Overall, I accept that the commies / tankies were here first, and the history of Lemmy makes it clear why that happened.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

So I’m a “capitalism works, but only if we work to make it work” kind of person. I think at the moment, Reddit and many other social networks are falling into the well known and well studied failures of raw capitalism, but somehow today’s society has forgotten all the 1910s era solutions that we did (ex: Jungle, etc. etc.) where we regulated the hell out of the shitty behavior and fixed the most blatant problems, for the better of America.

Right there with you.

We just gotta do the same thing today.

We also HAVE to teach the kids how to protect it better than people did 100 years ago. Most of our problems today stem from people voting to remove "useless red tape" (that was put there for damn good reasons).

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

The Marxist answer to why the red tape is removed is not because people directly vote for it, but that the State serves the bourgeoisie.

[–] 30p87@feddit.de 0 points 3 months ago

I haven't seen a rightist person here, ever.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Multiple reasons.

  1. Lemmy was crested by and is maintained by Marxist-Leninists.

  2. Lemmy's structure and rejection of the Profit Motive is in line with Communist ideals, and attracts Communists and other leftists over Reddit, which is Capitalist.

  3. FOSS in general is supported by Communists and Anarchists.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Be careful where you tread here. You must be careful to separate "communists" (people who believe in economic reorganization away from the power of capital) and "tankies" (those who support corrupt regimes that project the illusion of communism).

There are indeed quite a few communists and various other alt-camp political spectrum believers on here. They do have quite liberal beliefs but don't typically cause much of a fuss, because rational people can coexist with differing beliefs... and i dont mind them one bit. But the tankes, like lemmygrad, hexbear, etc, do stir up an anti-west "commie propaganda"fuss every chance they get, without being related to actual communism, especially if one mentions a hot button like Israel or Ukraine. And if you get into an argument with a tankie, they will just sling mud on you and call you a Nazi.

The cool part is, you can filter a lot of the chaff by just blocking the ugly instances from your user settings page (since Lemmy supports that now), blocking frequent flyers, and trimming/moving your subscribed community list to other, often smaller instances. A minimal amount of effort VASTLY increases the quality of content you'll see on lemmy.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Because there are a lot of communists on lemmy?

Some can be very annoying. If you haven't blocked hexbear, I highly recommend it. They got exiled from reddit years ago and have been stewing in a tankie echo chamber ever since.

[–] Sootius@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

90% of the shit spouted about Hexbear is just baseless nonsense. Soon as you actually try to have a good faith discussion, they're hecka cool.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

They're abrasive kinda like Twitch Chat, but many are reasonable.

[–] pocketman_stuck@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I've lived all my life under capitalism and I hate it.

I've read Marx, (for real, grab the book and read it!) and I see the dude does have a point.

[–] Pascal@lemdro.id 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Communist Manifesto

The language can be a bit tough to understand these days though so might want to read Ted Reese's Socialism Or Extinction instead

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

I'd recommend Chris Harman's How Marxism Works for an intro, or Engels' Principles of Communism. The Manifesto is more of a call to action for Workers than an overview of Communism, though it's still an important work nonetheless.

[–] Vitaly@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I strongly recommend you to read Animal Farm, it's very easy to understand

[–] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I’ve read it.

Orwell was socialist my dude.

Ever read one of his other books Down and Out in Paris and London?

It helps explain why he is a socialist.

[–] m13@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“I’m 17 and I hate communism”

😂 enough said. Come back when you’re a bit older and a bit wiser.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You don't even have to be wise to understand the problems communism has, it only helps

So your comment doesn't make sense.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What problems does Communism have?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ieatmeat@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Especially people who never lived in a communist state

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Especially people who never lived in a communist state

That’s a rather impossible requirement, considering that all “communist states” to date have been oligarchic autocracies that were just as much about communism as they were democratic.

Real communism is market ownership by the people, and not some elite cabal of politicians or capitalists. And a top-down planned economy is pretty much anti-communism, as it violates the very fundamentals of communism as being worker-driven.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

I think you should read Marx. State planning is definitely in line with Communism, the state is of the Workers and not a separate entity in Socialism and Communism.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm beginning to see why people call lemmy.world the Reddit of the fediverse

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

It's a microcosm of Reddit, in a lot of bad ways IMO.

  1. Reddit is clearly declining due to enshittification, so more ideological types leave. Radical liberals, Marxists, Anarchists, and so forth leave for other places.

  2. Leftists and people who have more niche interests like programming, Linux, FOSS, Piracy, Star Trek, LGBTQIA+, or other such unique interests go to more specific instances, while people seeking a replacement for Reddit go to the largest generalist instance.

The consequences of 1 and 2 are that Lemmy.world is filled with ideological liberals, but typically not leftists, FOSS enthusiasts, Piracy nerds, Star Trek, or other unique interests. All that's left is the ideological generalist crowd, which is an echo chamber more defined by what it isn't than by what it is.

[–] geissi@feddit.de 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Communism is by definition a society without a state, so nobody has ever lived in a communist state and I doubt there has ever been a communist society in recorded history.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

Comminism isn't anarchic, Anarcho-Communism is. While it's true that Communism has never been reached, it isn't because government remained. The State in Marxian terms refers to the mechanisms by which one class oppresses the other, once class is abolished there need not be a state.

Communism was always meant to be a world republic.

[–] MrEff@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That is at a 'state' level, there are still smaller level communist places to live. Like where the word 'Commune' comes from and what communism was derived from and attempted to expand into. There are communes all over the world. US included. There is a famous one in London, lots of large ones in Spain. They are communities that exist in their own bubble of micro economics within their larger communities of normal living. You should look it up. They are interesting and normally very appealing.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

Comminism, along Marxist lines, is meant to have a World Repunlic. It will have a government, but not a state.

Communes are more along Anarchist lines.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Communism is by definition a society without a state, so nobody has ever lived in a communist state

The last stage of the Marxist evolution of communism involves the decay of state institutions through neglect, as they become redundant in a post-scarcity no-cops Utopia.

But there are a bunch of prior stages (including capitalist industrialization even!) that are neglected. And even then, the utopian end-game is routinely disputed by the subsequent generations of Leninists and Maoists who believe we will never truly escape the revolutionary cycle.

There absolutely are Already Existing Socialist states attempting to move themselves from primitive accumulation, through industrial capitalism, and into a collectively governed socialist post-scarcity society. And people absolutely are living in them. And none of them are Utopian (although the quality of life in many of these countries is exhaustively propagandized to be by degrees to be between Unbearably Hellish and FALGSC-adjacent).

The problems that these countries typically have, however, aren't ones that armchair communists on a niche western internet platform are capable of solving. You're not going to break the Cuban blockade. You're not going to settle the endless territorial disputes plaguing Vietnam. You're not going to undo the legacy of generations of apartheid in South Africa overnight. You're not going to Make the USSR Great Again.

So maybe save yourself some angst and stop trying to tell Nicholas Maduro and Kim Jung Un how to do their jobs. Maybe worry more about why your local chapter of the DSA can't get a teacher's union off the ground.

[–] geissi@feddit.de 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You’re not going to break the Cuban blockade. You’re not going to settle the endless territorial disputes plaguing Vietnam. You’re not going to undo the legacy of generations of apartheid in South Africa overnight. You’re not going to Make the USSR Great Again.

So maybe save yourself some angst and stop trying to tell Nicholas Maduro and Kim Jung Un how to do their jobs

All these "you"s make me think that you might addressing me personally.
I make no claim to solve anything, nor how anyone should do their job.
I have provided an (incomplete) explanation as to what communism is, why it does not actually exist in practice and why therefore people commenting cannot be from a communist state.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

All these "you"s make me think that you might addressing me personally.

Apologies, I intended to use the Royal You and was speaking primarily to the British Crown.

I have provided an (incomplete) explanation as to what communism is, why it does not actually exist in practice and why therefore people commenting cannot be from a communist state.

A country in which the government has transitioned from primitive feudal to industrial capital and is now under a revolutionary socialist government is still communist at least in so far as its following the roadmap Marx and his peers tried to lay out two centuries ago.

If nothing else, these are communist governments in the sense that they take their governing philosophy from Marx, Lenin, and Mao (and Castro and Allende and Mandela and Ho Chi Mein and we can even throw in Fred Hampton and Rosa Luxemburg and Fatima Ahmed Ibrahim and the thousands of other notable revolutionaries if we're being generous) in pursuit of the communist goal.

To claim otherwise would be akin to claiming you're not a capitalist because you haven't successfully privatized your industry. Or to claim you aren't feudalist because you're not in the Royal Family.

[–] geissi@feddit.de 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A country [...] under a revolutionary socialist government is still communist

I would argue that in a world where the terms are not synonymous, socialist countries are in fact socialist, not communist.

at least in so far as its following the roadmap

Following a roadmap to some target literally means that you have not yet achieved that target.
The argument is not that their are no communists, the argument is that they have not established actual communism, therefore the states they govern are not communist states.
Whether or not they want to establish communism does not factor into it.

To claim otherwise would be akin to claiming that a company on a roadmap to profitability is already profitable, while actually still losing money.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

socialist countries are in fact socialist, not communist

Countries that reform their private sectors in order to adopt socialist policies are pursuing communism.

Countries that reform their socialist sectors in order to adopt privatization policies are not pursuing communism.

Following a roadmap to some target literally means that you have not yet achieved that target.

Right. You are implementing a policy that pursues a target.

Whether or not they want to establish communism does not factor into it.

"Mao wasn't a communist in 1953 because his country hadn't completed its first five year plan yet" is one hell of a claim.

To claim otherwise would be akin to claiming that a company on a roadmap to profitability is already profitable

It would be nutso to say Caryle Group isn't interested in investing in profitable companies.

And yet the entire strategy of growth investing is to identify companies with strong roadmaps and lend to them at higher return rates.

So your analogy works, but not for the reason you'd expected.

[–] geissi@feddit.de 0 points 3 months ago

“Mao wasn’t a communist in 1953 because his country hadn’t completed its first five year plan yet” is one hell of a claim.

One hell of a straw man, you mean.
At what point have I denied that people are communists?
Mao may be a communist and follow a philosophy called communism but China has not established a social order called communism as envisioned by communists.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Dunno about communist unless you count the tankies which I don't see on the main instances.

Lots of socialist stuff though.

[–] Sagittarii@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Socialism — the dictatorship of the working-class — is the transitional mode of production between capitalism — the dictatorship of the capitalist class — and the stateless, classless mode of production that is communism. You can't really separate the two.

[–] Sidyctism@feddit.de 0 points 3 months ago

Thats the communist definition of socialism. Socialism originally just referred to the leftist movement as a whole (including anarchists and dem-socs, which i guess he refers to). And is also used to refer to the concept of workers owning the means of production

load more comments
view more: next ›