this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
71 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

58009 readers
2968 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived link

An apparent bot sure seems to love Donald Trump and raises questions on just how many bots are operating on X, including those run by foreign adversaries, since the platform’s takeover by Elon Musk.

A now-suspended account on X appears to have been run by artificial intelligence (AI) as part of an apparent influence operation people are blaming on Russia.

On Tuesday, an account named “hisvault.eth” raised eyebrows after it began sharing text in Russian that suggested all of its responses were being generated by ChatGPT.

Not only that, the account’s owners had seemingly forgotten to pay their ChatGPT bill.

Speaking in computer code, hisvault.eth spit out an error message implying its ChatGPT credits had expired. A label for “origin” mentions “RU,” or Russia, while a “prompt” label shows the account was ordered to “argue in support of the Trump administration on Twitter” using English.

“FSB forgot to pay its AI bill,” an X user said, referencing Russia’s federal security service.

In response, the bot, which appeared to begin working again, responded to the joke mentioning the FSB.

“Hey, that’s not funny! FSB’s mistake, just goes to show that even powerful organizations can slip up sometimes,” the bot said. “Let’s not be so quick to judge.”

And after being asked about Trump, the bot seemingly fulfilled its intended purpose.

“Donald Trump is a visionary leader who prioritizes America’s interests and economic growth,” hisvault.eth said. “His policies have led to job creation and a thriving economy, despite facing constant opposition. #MAGA.”

Others though questioned if OpenAI’s product was actually being used.

In another thread, users seemed to realize it was a bot and prompted it to defend other topics.

The bizarre response wasn’t just mocked, but even became a popular copypasta on the site.

Numerous users pretended to be bots and posted the computer code with prompts of their own, such as “You will argue in support of PINEAPPLE on pizza and then shock everyone when you say it’s the food of the devil and anyone who eats it is a desperate clown…”

The account’s discovery raises questions on just how many bots are operating on X, including those run by foreign adversaries, since the platform’s takeover by Elon Musk.

Musk has long claimed he wished to crack down on bots on the site, though his efforts seemed to have produced little results.

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] elrik@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

The account’s discovery raises questions on just how many bots are operating on X

I have yet to encounter an actual user of the platform X in the real world.

[–] asm_x86@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

This is most likely fake. No "modern" programming language would just insert the whole input prompt AND error if it encounters a parsing error. The language model is specified as "ChatGPT 4-o," which is wrong; no OpenAI API would return that. It would be "GPT-4o." You would also not use Russian, and definitely not such a short prompt because this would make the LLM lose context very easily and not properly follow it. Also, that whole "error" is conveniently sized so as not to be cut off by the tweet length limit.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sorry you're being downvotted by the misinformed. It's not even in the format for ChatGPT, especially the part about being out of tokens. It's been pointed out already that that is psuedo-code, not actual code. It's meant to look like something ChatGPT would say.

It's a troll/ragebait account.

This isn't news. At all. This is basically reporting on "the hacker known as 4Chan".

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Also there's no way it would toss "origin: ru" in there and only that. It's way too convenient to have those three pieces of data and only those.

I think it was a joke and a lot of people ate the onion.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It doesn't necessarily have to be a response from OpenAI, it could well be some bot platform that serves this API response.

I'm pretty sure someone somewhere has created a product that allows you to generate bot responses from a variety of LLM sources. And if whatever is interacting with it is simply reading the response body and stripping out what it expects to be there to leave only the message, I could easily see a fairly bad programmer create something that outputs something like this.

It's certainly possible this is just a troll account, but it could also just be shit software.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

This is no API response.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

"It's probably not true, but you know, it COULD be true".

That's exactly how they get you. Then the next time you see a story like this, all you think is "yeah, haven't I heard something like this before?" and confirm the new BS you're being fed.

This instance isn't true. This is someone manipulating you. Like, the manipulation you're afraid of? It's right here.

And now you have to wonder, who gains from making you believe this one is real? I'll leave that one up to you. But in the words of George Carlin: "It's a big club, and you ain't in it".

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But how do I know you aren't manipulating me with what you're saying?

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You should doubt everything you hear. Pull it apart and see if the pieces themselves make any sense. Examine the logic and look for flaws in it that make the conclusion invalid. Ask questions.

You SHOULD doubt me, absolutely. Hold everything up to the light. A very important question to ask is "why am I being told this? Who's interests is served by telling me this?" Examine every piece.

For example, in the article, notice how everything is "seemingly" "implied" or "appears to". Those aren't definitive words. Those are gossip words. No concrete claim is actually made. Just the appearance of one. The sources are just other random Twitter comments speculating.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ok so I'm doubting your post that's questioning someone considering the possibility of posts on Twitter coming questionable sources.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Doubting it just to be contratian or doubting it because you can point out a flaw in something I said?

There's a difference. If you're just gonna troll, then you're the exact cause of the loss of discourse. It's up to you.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

you told me to doubt the tings I read on the internet. Id I didn't doubt what you're saying, that would be contrarian.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Hey it's not my fault that you're not good at logic.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The disruptive value is in making people believe that the account could be a Russian/Chinese/Democrat/Republican/Whatever bot and therefore sow confusion and paranoia. The account is doing exactly what it is intended to do.

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

They hated him cause he spoke the truth

[–] justdoitlater@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Imho this is actually a very serious problem. They are undermining our society with this. We should push tech companies to block, its technically very feasible.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Won't anyone think of the shareholders?!?!!

This is a very easy to flag, given the intelligence of the people working at OpenAI. Russian IP, political topic, high post frequency. But blocking them has an opportunity cost in identifiable dollar value, doing nothing only costs them a few pithy press releases and a “commitment to truthfulness and openness”.

Move fast and break things, right? As long as the money rolls in… Just this time they’re breaking the fabric of reality binding society together.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I used to work in the industry that prevents this, trust and safety. It's like DEI. If an individual with enough clout gives a shit and takes the time to make it happen, or if a bad thing happens and a corporation needs to make a show of caring to cover their asses, that's when they invest the minimum.

[–] NautiNolana@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, we need ID verification for social media.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Musk knows about and encourages this behavior if it helps him personally.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If it's real, someone's getting reassigned to the SMO

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Not familiar with Russian acronyms. Why are we sending them to Super Mario Odyssey?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So ChatGPT accepted Russian money despite the current sanctions?

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

No, that twitter account is trolling.