this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
963 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

58937 readers
3389 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A bomb that could destroy Earth's core would be an admittedly impressive technical feat!

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Nono, the bombs starts the earths core

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] menemen@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

I mean it is cool. But really a testament to why we deserve extinction at this point...

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

That article gets stuck so much and makes my (relatively high end) laptop's fan scream so hard you'd think the website was designed for that kind of hardware.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wouldn't just one GPU be enough to run the Sphere, or a I getting something wrong?

I remember hearing about that it's not exactly high resolution, each "pixel" being a bunch of pretty large lamps.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Wikipedia says it's 16,000x16,000 (which is way less than I thought). The way the math works, that's 16x as big as a 4k monitor, so 16 GPUs would make sense. And there's a screen inside and one outside, so double that. But I also can't figure out why it needs five times that. Redundancy? Poor optimization? I dunno.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

But wouldn't that be only necessary if it needed to render real-time graphics at such a scale? If I'm correct, all its doing is playing back videos.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Ok, so it's "capable of drawing" enough power for 20,000 homes in the area. How much does it actually use day to day? Does it dim at night and brighten in the daytime to keep those ads rolling in the sunshine?

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

That pretty much describes all of Vegas.

[–] geography082@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 months ago

And unless it displays a picture of Mr. House it's all for naught

[–] Iloveyurianime@ani.social 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I guess they dont need to pay for heating when you have a bunch of high power computers pumping out a crap ton of heat

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

It also helps that it's in Las Vegas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago

At every stage of it’s life cycle; the Sphere has been the dumbest thing imaginable

And because some rich people got scammed into buying in now everyone has to advertise it

[–] SunDevil@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

"Capable of drawing 28,000,000 watts of power" doesn't tell us anything. As was noted, it should've been given in megawatts (28 mW) or kilowatts (28,000 kW). Clickbait aside, how many kilowatt-hours (kWh) does it actually use?

28 mW isn't that much energy, relatively speaking. As of 2015, Forbes estimated LV uses 8000 mW on an average summer day.

The potential is impressive. I doubt it pulls anywhere near that. Unless I did my math wrong, this seems sensationalist.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›