this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
161 points (97.1% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3580 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 88 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What a fucking moron. Trump will always be anti-union.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 58 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Im pro union but actual teamsters are fucking idiots. Shop steward at my work has a hammer and sickle, Trump, and Teamster sticker on his bumper sticker.

Dude, you make $38/hr plus $8/hr pension but you really want to make $14/hr like the warehouse next to us?

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I'm a school bus driver and we're Teamsters; most of my co-workers are rabidly pro-union and just as rabidly pro-Trump. A few are even lesbians and pro-Trump. It just doesn't make any sense, except for the fact that they're so racist they even hate Chinese food.

BTW our union is why we make $30 an hour plus benefits like health insurance and a pension instead of the $18 an hour with no benefits that the drivers in neighboring districts who work for private bus companies make.

[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Definite "cut off your nose to spite your face" vibes.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are the teamsters tankies?

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 month ago

Lmao no wtf

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As will the rest of the Republican party.

[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And yet union members vote for them in droves.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because a good chunk are morons. I work with them everyday lol.

[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I've been a union member 3 times and you're not wrong.

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Trump will be whatever the highest bidder pays him to be, …or do.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah, the ol' "If suck up enough surely the leopard won't eat my face" strategy. That's never gone wrong.

Seriously, who would expect Trump to be a man of his word or show even a shred of loyalty at this point? His presidency was full of him talking up somebody as a being great, loyal and brilliant, then in a month or two he'd chuck them under the bus at the first signs of trouble.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This just in, hang on I'm receiving breaking news!

It seems as if all Republicans have ripped out their own eyes to make their misguided views more plausible, back to you Tom.

Oh wait, one second Tom, I think they're all just comically gullible.

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

CLASS TRAITOR

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And a racist.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

I don't see an issue with this, despite how this and other articles are trying to frame this. I'd be more upset if a national labor union wasn't trying to talk to all political parties and officials. That's literally their entire purpose, to act as a voice for their members to employers and politicians. Sticking their head in the sand because a party historically hasn't been helpful doesn't do anything. Trying to maintain an open dialog despite that history to try and change things is what they should be doing.

Trump historically has been anti-labor, and likely ain't going to change, but that doesn't mean you ignore the politician or the party entirely. Or even try to provoke them like some people seem to be advocating they do. That's just a stupid idea that creates irrational enemies you can't even talk to anymore, and that's the last thing you want when trying to lobby for your members.

The Teamsters asked to speak at both conventions, the DNC still hasn't responded. If anything, this says more about the DNC than many people seem to realize to be honest. Yet again they seem to be assuming certain groups will fall in line behind them just because they're the only other option. Ignoring things like voter apathy and that there's a decent chunk of people that only vote out of spite rather than for what they want, and blatantly ignoring their needs means turning a potential undecided or non-voter voters against them instead.

If we've learned anything over these last few years, it's that people are angry and will also vote against their own interests, even in the face of overwhelming evidence. We can't rely on logic and/or historical results or precedent to predict the future anymore. The old ways simply don't apply like they used to, that's been evident in so many polls being wildly inaccurate to election outcomes the last few elections.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He better not turn into another Hoffa. We've had two of those, and honestly, 1 was enough.

[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

He could already be corrupt which would explain ~~cum-guzzling~~ courting TFG.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago

don’t kink shame – some people are into being humiliated …

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The teamsters president and trump can go fuck themselves. Capital will never be an ally to labor despite the bullshit they spew