this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
282 points (82.5% liked)

Memes

45886 readers
1268 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

True in many cases, but there were wars before there was capitalism.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

And in those times the causes were things like feudalism.

[–] Wrufieotnak 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The problem is and always was the power structure and the greed of those at the top of it. It had many different names and forms during history.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not all economic structures reward the same pursuits. Capitalism, as an example, naturally selects for those who can accumulate the most and discards the rest, and this process has been the source of countless wars.

[–] Wrufieotnak 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree with your comment, but I didn't talk about economic structures, but rather about how power is distributed in a society. That is closely connected to the economic structure, sure. But for example the Soviet Union was state socialism and started enough wars themselves. Also not because the workers wanted it, but those in power did.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

The Soviet Union acted in its own interests, of course, but the wars it helped were largely those of national liberation from Colonialism, such as in Algeria or Palestine. That's why it is important to understand economic basis.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] protist@mander.xyz 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, every non-capitalist country throughout history has been a beacon of peace lmao

Humans are human. Capitalism is absolutely a driver of some conflict, but conflict is driven not only by economic interests, but also political, ethnic, religious, and other interests.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Capitalism is the primary driver of wars, it determines the basic structure of what is and is not permissible, generates nation-states (these did not always exist, actually), and then creates the conditions by which the national bourgeoisie nation-states push for war in order to become international bourgeoisie (imperialists).

For example, the US keeps the middle east in a regular state of war to prevent them from having independent policies regarding oil. It is concerned about oil because of the petrodollar. It is concerned about the petrodollar because it is th3 primary financial war instrument by which it jeeps other countries sending superprofits its way and otherwise screwing with countries using interest rates. And it does those things because the US is the global seat of capital, it is where the big finance companies are based.

How many wars have there been in the middle east since 2000? How has the US been involved? Do they just do it for the thrill of domination?

[–] protist@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Look dude, I'm not here to argue about the US's absolutely fucked foreign policy, and in absolutely no fucking way am I saying any one conflict is not driven in whole or in part by capitalism.

But "Capitalism is the primary driver of wars" is a fundamentally false statement. Just because it's a driver of some or even most modern conflicts does not make it "the primary driver of wars." War is a well documented and studied social phenomenon that predates capitalism by thousands of years, maybe millions. Fucking chimpanzee tribes war with each other. There are thousands upon thousands of wars throughout human history that prove your statement wrong.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought it would be implied that I'm speaking about modern times. The economic system is the msin driver in large societies, though. In Europe, prior to capitalism, the primary determinant was feudal interests.

Chimps don't have war. They fight, but is every skirmish a war? Wars come from creating and wielding armies.

[–] Mr_Peartree@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You are obviously wrong because you left out the entire USSR and what happened to Eastern Europe post WW2. Go read a history book!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 24 points 1 week ago

Capitalism is a source of so many problems, yet somehow you singed and missed.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (25 children)

I can't figure out exactly why Russia invaded Ukraine, but I don't think it's capitalism. The oligarchs certainly didn't appreciate it very much now. My guess is it was for some misguided desire for legacy?

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is as reductive as when people say religion is what causes all wars. Humans cause war. Race, religion, nationality, money, power,etc. All of them,and more, have been used as pretexts for war.

[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago

everybody wants to rule the world in some way or another even if it means killing everyone else smh

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's easy to forget capitalism (and imperialism) aren't the natural state of things and there were wars before it. Of course, that's doesn't mean it doesn't perpetuate and indeed requires wars and exploitation to continue existing.

[–] PantanoPete@tucson.social 9 points 1 week ago

Oh man I was already beaten by a lemmy.world user saying something stupid

[–] random@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

cool, so taiwan, tibet and mongolia don't have to worry at all

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] laserm@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What about wars started by communist nations?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NicolaHaskell@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Anybody reading Aristophanes in these times of demagogues and world wars? I just finished Birds and Peace. Studies of democracy, Greek hegemony, and hellenization feel like a refresher on familiar problems and their perspectives. I think he was writing about 250 years after Homer, and today we're writing about 250 years after the US framers.

[–] perry@lemy.lol 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well IMO it is a bit simplistic to just toss it to capitalism.

I do agree that capitalists profit from wars and historically have started wars for profit, but the current conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza are a bit more complicated.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The Gaza colonialist takeover is as straighforward as you can get.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ghen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

It's ignoring the crusades

load more comments
view more: next ›