this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
110 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39376 readers
2089 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko confirmed the deployment of over a dozen Russian nuclear weapons in Belarus, integrating the country’s military with Russia under the Union State treaty.

Signed by Lukashenko and Vladimir Putin, the treaty allows joint use of Russian nuclear weapons, though Moscow retains control.

Putin’s updated nuclear doctrine lowers the threshold for nuclear use, even in response to conventional attacks.

Critics, including Belarusian opposition figures, denounce the treaty as undermining Belarus’s sovereignty, while Lukashenko has also requested advanced Russian missiles, escalating tensions with NATO and neighboring countries.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 2 weeks ago

Putin: "reeeeeeee nato encroachment reeeee I'm doing this because I have to"

Also putin: actively encroaching on NATO with nuclear weapons

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

"Putin's closest ally says more than dozen nuclear weapons in Belarus"

I know this is a supposed to be sabre rattling, but its hard to take Lukashenko seriously so this messaging strikes me like a Craiglist posting. "I have more than a dozen nuclear weapon for sale. No lowballs. I know what I got."

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

"I'll throw in some free fill dirt too".

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They are the most tracked things on the planet, we can pretty literally tell their rough positions with satellites and networked detectors.

They almost certainly aren't there and if they are we know about it.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They are the most tracked things on the planet,

I only have a limited understanding of arms controls treaties. In those, at least, the nuclear warheads themselves aren't tracked. What is tracked is called "seats". These are delivery mechanisms for nuclear warheads. This includes things like aircraft (bombers), submarines, tactical and strategic missiles. Essentially, the logic says that it doesn't matter how many warheads you have if you can't get them to a target to threaten the target then they are not a threat to track. Only the ones you can get to your enemy count.

This mechanism was also used because military regularly remove warheads from active status for service, and swap them with warheads coming out of refreshes. Tracking the seats means not having to track regular maintenance.

So its entirely possible that Putin did send missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads (real seats), with or without the warheads. I agree with you that I'm not sure Putin trusts Lukashenko with real active warheads, but I could certainly see Putin shipping some tactical missiles that could carry a nuclear warhead.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

By treaty no, by power, money and influence they are all known. Russia spends a huge amount of its defense budget on simply tracking them and we do the same.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Next week, Zelensky: "I got more than a dozen nuclear weapons in Ukraine."

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Not that I don't believe him, it's just that I don't care what he has to say. Unlike Trump's comments about Trudeau being a governor of a new American state, that is basically what Lukashenko is to Russia.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Why does Putin's face look more and more like a plastic surgery disaster in every photo?

[–] filister@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Dumb and dumber

[–] socsa@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

Nobody cares.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Putin’s bitch. It’s not like Luka has a say in any of it.