this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
75 points (92.1% liked)

politics

18863 readers
3940 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Absolute coincidence that this was the rise of neoliberism...

/s

Seriously tho, it's concerning they don't mention this is when Dems started trying to compromise with Republicans on fiscal policy which drove republicans further right to differentiate.

[–] Yearly1845@reddthat.com 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

This article is specifically talking about how Republicans went from Regan -> Trump and you're over here going WhAT abOuT tHE dEMoCrAtS?

Besides, the interview specifically talks about how Regan buttfucked the left at the end of the cold war and that they had nothing to offer the public in return, and how they utterly failed to provide a meaningful alternative.

Neolibs are scum, but that's not the point of this article.

Dems started trying to compromise with Republicans on fiscal policy which drove republicans further right to differentiate.

"Waaaaaaaa the evil democrats forced us to be Nazis with their wicked compromise ideology! Don't you see this is all their fault!"

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

What he said was exactly right, though. Third-Way Democrats like Clinton started adopting conservative views on austerity and taxes to try and emulate Regan's success. In order to keep distinguishing themselves from their Democratic rivals, Republicans kept adopting further right economic and social policies. The end result of that rightward lurch is Trump.

"Waaaaaaaa someone gave me some additional historical context that contradicted my worldview!"

[–] Maeve@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Yes, I thought the article was about that and ideas for correcting neoliberalism and how to root it out, effectively. I was sorely disappointed.

[–] hypnoton@discuss.online 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As intended by the Dem elites.

It's not an oopsie. They think we are too dumb to see through their chicanery.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

That's always been their modis operandi, push right-wing legislation. Then when they get busted they claim they were short-sighted.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bill Clinton and his DLC not only started the momentum of pushing the party to the right and that momentum hasn't stopped, but has accelerated at enormous speed

[–] audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago

It marks the start of Democrats caring more about winning and getting donations than the American people