this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
412 points (97.7% liked)

World News

39364 readers
2108 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A YouGov poll revealed that 77% of Germans support banning social media for those under 16, similar to a new Australian law.

The survey found that 82% believe social media harms young people, citing harmful content and addiction.

In Australia, the law fines platforms up to AUD 49.5 million (€30.5M) for allowing under-16s to create accounts, with enforcement trials set before implementation next year. Critics

(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pugsnroses77@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

i dunno ab this bc social media is vague. corporate sites that pump out politically divisive content, misinformation, harmful content, etc. should be a bigger target? when i was a teenager, using social media platforms to connect to queer spaces was essential for me, but i was on reddit and tumblr rather than instagram or tiktok. its a tough line between protecting minors and restricting their freedom on their behalf. sucks that parents cant just step up and do what's right, because the law can be unnecessarily suffocating. at the very least, seems like its the companies, not the kids, who'd be punished. curious to see how this plays out.

edit: spelling is hard

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Get off my lawn kids!

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Queer kids and kids in abusive households can just die, apparently.

[–] etuomaala@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago

No ban is proposed on IRC or email.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›