this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
40 points (88.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2067 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
40
Who is backing Biden? We're keeping track (www.npr.org)
submitted 4 months ago by alecto@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Democrats have long-acknowledged concerns about President Biden’s age and ability to lead the country for a second term, but Biden’s disastrous debate performance against former President Donald Trump on June 27 has left the president’s campaign in a crisis.

Biden and his campaign have recognized that the coming days are crucial to convincing voters and his party that he has what it takes to win the election.

They also insist that he is staying in the race.

But the public display of Biden’s weakness prompted calls from Democratic members of Congress for Biden to step down as the party’s presidential nominee — while others continue to stand by the president, and a growing number of Democrats express concerns about Biden.

NPR is tracking which Democratic lawmakers have called on Biden to step out of the race, expressed concerns, or have said they back Biden’s presidential bid.

This list will be updated as more Democrats weigh in.

The original article contains 156 words, the summary contains 156 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Nothing scares me more than the thought that Biden's cognitive decline may be more severe than we realize and that he's stuck in this state of delusion that he's far more capable than he actually is.

To quote Jim Jefferies, "That's the thing about crazy people. They don't know they're crazy. That's what makes them crazy!"

To those who didn't view the interview, here are some highlights:

  • Biden denied his approval ratings are 37% when Stephanopoulos noted, "Mr. President I've never seen a President win with 36% approval rating." (fact-check: it's 37% in reality. Same as Carter when he lost)
  • Biden said only divine intervention would have him step down.
  • Biden said he'd feel okay should he lose against Trump because he "tried his best."
[–] No_Change_Just_Money@feddit.de 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The second one gets blown really out of proportion

He was told a list of people and was asked if any of them would convince him to step down

If he said yes to any of them it would mean he trusts their judgement more than his own which would be a terrible look for a president so he basically said there is nobody who shapes my decision besides myself and God (because you need christian voters)

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I hope to fuck you're right but I still feel he could've handled that question better:

"I'll follow my conscience, weigh my trusted confidants' advice, and consider sound data."

[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Who's been backing him? Well....you have been, NPR. Religiously no matter what he does.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The alternative is the death of NPR so yeah.

[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

If they have to move to the right out of a sense of self preservation that kind of illustrates my point. The existence of NPR only matters in so far as it is able to speak truth to power, it has been steadily losing that ability.

[–] toastus -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Bull.

Shit.

[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Not really, NPR is a staunch supporter of the neoliberal establishment and function the same as MSNBC or other corporate outlets. They help prop up the corporate right wing of the Democratic party and suppress the center/left.

They've failed to elevate any of the very real criticisms of Biden, the only time they host criticism is when he's moved left even the smallest amount, then they're all over it.

They're also extremely susceptible to adopting the political terminology and framing provided by the far-right and seem incapable of recognizing that they're being played. It's why they describe the genocide in Gaza as a "war" still, describe people like Manchin as "moderates" and "centrists", and why they demonize people like Sanders as "the far left".

It makes people uncomfortable to hear, but NPR is corporate conservative more than it is center/left or even liberal really. They have been instrumental in moving the Overton window to the right, mainly out of political incompetence and self-interest.