this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
111 points (92.4% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2649 readers
2 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skittlebrau@lemmy.world 56 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It’s been long established that they were landing pads for Goa’uld motherships.

Kree!

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Seriously though, I feel like you can blame a significant portion of the ancient aliens theories out there directly on Roland Emmerich.

[–] skittlebrau@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Plausible deniability - same with Wormhole Xtreme! ;)

It's..... What I do.

It's... What I do.

It's what I do...

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 31 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Lined up with Orions Belt is that great little sprinkle of wild, flailing outrage that makes no sense whatsoever.

How could ancient people, with their better visibility of the stars and greater common understanding and reliance on their position for navigation, place things on the ground to match stars?!

But also, Orions Belt is 3 randomly bright stars in a line, not at all nearby to each other in space, that arc across the night sky every evening and change position in the night sky throughout the years. Aligned how?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Would the stars in Orion's belt even be in the same positions relative to our perception 4000-5000 years BP? I don't know enough about the astronomy side of things, but I know stars generally don't stay at a static position in the sky long-term.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Stars are not static, but slight movement is only detected after hundreds of thousands of years. Add into that the movement of the earth precession, it wobbles kind of like a top, one rotation every 10k years so that stars are not always in the same spot in our sky. This is why astrology and the zodiac symbols no longer line up with the dates allowed to them.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

That's correct. The positions can be simulated, and IIRC, they do match from the time of their construction.

Of course, that just means they mapped out some stars and stuck the buildings in the same relative positions.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

How could they match? Star positions in the sky are dependent on Earth's orbit and wobble. Their height to and from the horizon changes from Earth's tilt and position across the sky from Earth's rotation. The only constant (ish) stars are like Polaris and Little Bear because they're at the celestial poles, so appear in the same spot. Orion appears to move all over the place relative to time of day and time of year.

[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I don't believe in any of this BS in post but 4000 BP, people could build and align with the sky. it wouldn't be unheard of to build things that align with what they view as significant objects. they were unaware that the middle star is way farther away but so much larger it looks the same as the other two. they didn't have a detailed grasp but could ascertain some movements. No, Orions belt hasn't shifted much over the millenia. Orion's shoulder (betelguise) should explode any day now though.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

Sorry, yeah, that was sarcasm. Exactly, it's 3 stars in a line that everyone would be more familiar with than the vast majority of people today.

There are loads of examples of ancient architecture that perfectly lines up with celestial events at a particular time.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Orion's shoulder (betelguise) should explode any day now though.

I'm sorry, What?

Wait, is this something we won't be able to see until like 300 years after it happens? Or do we just say it's name three times?

[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think it's a few thousand light years away, but yes, it could have already happened.

say it's name 3 times backwards will summon the demon called de.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

no, de-ez nutz.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

The latest news that I've seen is that it won't explode for tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of years. It's predicted that in the next 300 years it'll run out of fuel leading to collapse.

[–] Asetru 2 points 4 months ago

Aligned how?

Orions Belt is 3 [...] stars in a line

Weil, they're certainly three pyramids in a line, aren't they?

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 26 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The speed of light thing makes me laugh so hard, as it's referenced to the speed of light in METRIC! To be specific the 1983 definition.

But hey, if ancient Egyptians were using a unit defined in 1983 aliens must have been involved right? No way they figured that out themselves.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well that makes total sense to me. I thought it was well known that the speed of light as measured in metric units is actually determined by the placement of the pyramid, not the other way around.

[–] Foggyfroggy@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We should use the speed of dark

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Not a useful measure as it's too quick

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I love how these racist nut jobs can’t figure out that coloured people were able to do anything.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 14 points 4 months ago

To be fair, this wackjob seems to think we can’t build that sort of structure today. They should probably get out more.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Calling everything racist waters it down...these are the same people who think we didn't go to the moon...which carried a bunch of white guys.

This isn't racism, it's just ignorance.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm convinced that a major factor is that these people are so incredibly basic and are coping. Any amount of real math or a day of physical labor would break these people and they're not comfortable with that.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (5 children)

This unlocked a memory for me. Back when I was a kid I remember one of the religious whackos told us that the reason the ark of the covenant killed the dude that touched it was because it was a battery. He used the fact that there was no battery technology at the time to support the fact that god is real.

I know it's off topic, but harnessing energy reminded me.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago

There were no batteries, so it was a battery, ergo god is real.

It all makes sense.

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 4 months ago

Indiana Jones is my favorite docuseries 😍

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That dude must have had the good weed while watching mythbusters

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This would have been a decade before that.

You don't realize how much batshit stuff you're told as a kid and I never examined it as an adult. A lot of this shit is coming back to me and I'm realizing just how much of a thing all this crazy shit was even before it became widespread on the internet.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Gods, I feel that so hard lol.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The fun part is we don't have any real evidence outside the Bible that the Ark of the Covenant even existed. Did it exist? Who knows? You can't really take the Bible's word for much.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 months ago

I mean, all the Ark of the Covenant is is a box that holds the “original” (oldest version of the) Torah. So…sure, it existed. If I write a novel and put it in a cigar box and say it’s super special and has magical powers, the box and the book exist while the magic powers probably don’t.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well now I know where he got the idea, and I doubt he could have remembered the word capacitor. So that became battery in his mind.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's possible that the Ark could have generated enough static electricity to give you a shock on the order of rubbing your feet on the carpet and then touching a door knob. Maybe.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

It smote that one dude! Rubbing balloons in our hair will kill us!!1!!

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 4 months ago

You didn’t know the pyramids generate free electricity? Electric companies hate this one weird trick!

[–] unreachable@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago
[–] dxc@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

So why not ditch the interior material and use chamber material everywhere? Unlimited energy for the ancient Egypt.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Oh you and your logic.

[–] HamsterRage@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

What would be the point? They hadn't even invented the electric kettle yet.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Sometimes, I read these things and I can recognize the words, but my mind can't process them as being coherent ideas.

[–] weeahnn@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Aliens really did build the pyramids. I know. I was there.

::: spoiler I was the anal probe. :::

[–] blahsay@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Maybe, but you don't really need whips if everyone is convinced they're building something to appease a living god.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[–] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Yes, people of old times were advanced, intelligent, not like people today.