this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
-29 points (30.7% liked)

Technology

59517 readers
3172 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

So they reinvented the thin client. Wow.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But for that you can buy a mini PC that runs it locally. What the fuck is this even for?

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What the fuck is this even for?

Like most Microsoft hardware made after a certain year: Microsoft fans who will literally buy a box of feces if M$ sold it.

[–] tsugu@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

Corporates. 60€/month is an acceptable price for them.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why would I pay so much for such thing?

[–] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Because $350 couldn't possibly buy enough hardware to run a modern operating system!

  • Microsoft, probably
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would say Win11 runs rather well even on old crappy devices. If they let it run on it :)

[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Or just use linux and dont worry.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

640K ought to be enough for everybody.

[–] PushButton@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No one here is talking about the subscription that will come with it...

If it streams from someone's else computer,you will have to pay for that "service"....

Why pay Windows once when you can pay it every month!

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Makes sense for a business. Less so for the individual.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

Almost every cloud based device I've ever owned ended up either putting an increasing number of basic features that were originally free behind a subscription paywall or simply turned itself into a brick when it stopped being supported.

[–] mustbe3to20signs 12 points 1 day ago

Imagine spending 350 bucks on a device that turns into useless e-waste the second M$ changes their business strategy

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

$350 for a thin client locked out of doing anything useful and requiring a subscription to function?

[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Link device is designed to be a compact, fanless, and easy-to-use cloud PC for your local monitors and peripherals. It’s meant to be the ideal companion to Microsoft’s Windows 365 service, which lets businesses transition employees over to virtual machines that exist in the cloud and can be streamed securely to multiple devices.

It sounds like it's part of a broader strategy to have companies outsource their IT to Microsoft.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but it's priced the same as a cheap laptop and/or desktop, which of course doesn't then require you to pay monthly to actually use the stupid thing.

It feels like another 'Microsoft asked Microsoft what Microsoft management would buy, and came up with this' product, and less one that actually has a substantial market, especially when you're trying to sell a $350 box that costs you $x a month to actually use as a 'business solution'.

This would probably be a cool product at $0 with-a-required-contract-with-Azure, but at $350.... meh, I suspect it's a hard sale given the VDI stuff on Azure isn't cheap.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

which of course doesn't then require you to pay monthly to actually use the stupid thing.

I think the idea here is that the businesses can lay off some of their in-house IT staff and pay Microsoft a lesser amount instead; the in-house IT staff does get paid monthly.

[–] HeyLow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

You could buy a steam deck for this price

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If they made it cheaper it would at least make sense.

For that price you can just get a raspberry pi 5, you can stream on it but also use it as a low end Linux machine

[–] Voytrekk@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

This feels way too expensive for what is a dumbed down device. Maybe $50-$100, but you would still end up paying quite a bit for something that requires a subscription.

For the price they are asking, you could get a desktop with OK performance that will be free forever after that.

[–] upside431@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] simonced@lemmy.one 1 points 1 day ago

Yep, that sound worth than Recall.
People are buying that shit?! LOLOLOLOL

[–] richardisaguy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

i think this is the most stupid product i have ever heard of. I can't help but imagine the unholy latency of transferring files from "your computer" to an external storage.

[–] vaper@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I thought this was a mini-pc to compete with the mac mini, until I realized its streaming only. I'd much rather cough up the extra $250 for the insane jump in power that the mac mini gives you.

[–] soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id 2 points 2 days ago

It looks pretty ig

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

No thanks. I do want the large wifi enabled suppository that probably comes with it 😉. I can use that in times of loneliness and despair.