this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
187 points (99.0% liked)

World News

39364 readers
2192 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The internationally agreed goal to keep the world’s temperature rise below 1.5C is now “deader than a doornail”, with 2024 almost certain to be the first individual year above this threshold, climate scientists have gloomily concluded – even as world leaders gather for climate talks on how to remain within this boundary.

Three of the five leading research groups monitoring global temperatures consider 2024 on track to be at least 1.5C (2.7F) hotter than pre-industrial times, underlining it as the warmest year on record, beating a mark set just last year. The past 10 consecutive years have already been the hottest 10 years ever recorded.

“The goal to avoid exceeding 1.5C is deader than a doornail. It’s almost impossible to avoid at this point because we’ve just waited too long to act,” said Zeke Hausfather, climate research lead at Stripe and a research scientist at Berkeley Earth. “We are speeding past the 1.5C line an accelerating way and that will continue until global emissions stop climbing.”

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WheelcharArtist@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago (3 children)

who would have thought that nothing happens if we do nothing...

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Oh look, the consequences of our inaction

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

I made these non binding, voluntary promises before AI 🥺

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

10-16 million voters who didn’t feel it was necessary to stop a fascist?

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The real value is, …around 7-8 degrees C

Everyone in climate research knows it.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Current models point towards a max ~6°C anomaly for the pessimistic (and, imo, most probable) scenarios where we continue acting as we are now.

[–] troed@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tell that to Michael Mann, perhaps one of the most distinguished climate scientists:

“Actually, the warming of the planet is very much in line with early climate model predictions. Some impacts, such as ice sheet melt and sea level rise, and the slowdown of the ocean ‘conveyor belt’ are exceeding those predictions.” Current policies alone likely keep warming below 3°C (5.4°F), nowhere near the “worst-case” scenarios.

https://www.aps.org/apsnews/2023/09/climate-doomism-disregards-science

[–] kozy138@lemm.ee 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

These models always assume that direct carbon capture technologies will extract ridiculous amounts of the CO2 out of the atmosphere.

Also 3C will be devastating as is though. That's not including biodiversity loss, ocean acidification, and rising sea levels.

[–] Lauchmelder 1 points 2 weeks ago

Did you read the article?

Current models don't assume carbon capture technologies to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, they assume interactions with the oceans to remove CO2 from the atmosphere.

And yes, 3C will be devastating, but not doing anything will be more devastating, that's also what the article says. If all lower goals are out of reach we should still aim for 3C because 3C is a lot better than 4C. Saying a certain temperature is devastating is not a useful comment in a scenario where that is the only good option left.

We fucked up, now we must act based on the current situation.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

See you in hell 'God bless this house'.