this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
192 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2569 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 111 points 1 week ago (31 children)

All the people who were screeching to abandon Harris because of Gaza seem awfully quiet now

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Anticolonialist turned into a puff of smoke immediately after the election.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure they were just banned. This place has become somewhat of a lib echo chamber.

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Or they were a Russian bot.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Gosh but I heard that all genocide is equal and Biden is literally the devil. Do you mean that having a meaningful impact on whether Palestinians live or die was worth swallowing my pride and voting for Harris? But isn't my ideal that no Palestinian should die more important than actually saving the lives of Palestinians?

/s I absolutely can't fucking stand people who were unable to realize that less harm would, in fact, be less harmful.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You say "unable to realize", I say "intentionally pushed a false narrative to increase voter apathy".

Especially since many of them refused to engage any discussion on how much worse Trump would be.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 days ago

It's a combination of both. Lots of useful idiots. Just see that thing AOC did to find out why people would split the vote with her and Trump.

People in this country are straight up dangerously stupid.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 31 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I have a feeling a lot of them were not American. The bot farms are quiet now because they got what they wanted.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Too bad the actual fascist Americans who elected Trump are still with you. It's always someone else's fault not America's.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Well it's not like Biden/Harris actually tried for a ceasefire. There's really not much change other than the quiet part being said out loud.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah that cease fire Biden negotiated was way better!

Oh, wait.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Are they? I see the comments still full of them.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] themoken@startrek.website 25 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Everyone pointing at people that didn't vote for Harris over Gaza like this is some gotcha moment are totally missing the point. If Gaza was your primary concern (like if you and your family are Palestinian perhaps) neither candidate was going to do anything for you at all. Harris paid a tiny bit of lip service to Gaza two days before the election after months of shutting down and ignoring everyone demanding ceasefire.

I voted Harris purely out of harm reduction, but she offered nothing to anyone on the left. The DNC assumes everyone that is queer or bipoc or a woman owes them their vote and then used the platform to court non-existent center right voters.

But nah, let's pretend that Harris, who took Biden's positions wholesale, would have done something different as if they weren't currently in power. Let's pretend they would have done something to restore abortion rights too, or tackle climate change or raise the minimum wage when they're so busy trying to get fascist votes and not piss off the coporate donor class.

The Democratic party needs to be rebuilt from scratch or not rebuilt at all.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You know, you should have read this before you claim Harris offered nothing to anyone on the left: https://www.politifact.com/article/2024/sep/30/kamala-harris-2024-campaign-promises-here-are-her/

[–] themoken@startrek.website 3 points 6 days ago

Everything on that list is typical neoliberal Democrat tinkering around the edges while the world burns.

It's not that the individual ideas are bad, it's that they have no vision of a better future for most people. Where is Medicare For All? Where is tuition free college? Where is anything that isn't just a bandaid for a specific paper cut when the whole goddam country is being devoured by fascists and corporations?

That's the meat I'm talking about - something that millions of people on the left could vote for in self interest. What we got was meat for checks notes non-Medicare diabetics.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Something, something Republicans are peacemakers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let them who are most pro-war get to fight on the front lines.

Idc if it's a one sided genocide, this fluffy politician who wouldn't last a 3 mile ruck should get to experience wtf he's actually advocating.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›