this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
28 points (85.0% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2919 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grogon@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Im not american maybe someone can explain:

The president just chooses whoever he wants for specific roles in the administration? Thats a News Host?

Can he also just pick a UPS driver too?

This is wild. Or is this dude someone really important, the article only said he was in military vet and fox news host?

I'd go insane if my president would add our news hosts into such a position LOL. This is comedy. Is this real? Am I stupid? Can someone explain what is going on to someone who isn't from US?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This guy is a yes man, the only requirement apparently. As an American, it is verifiably insane.

[–] Grogon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

This reminds me of when I was in the second grade and my friend and I had to make soccer teams and pick our teammates one by one and both of us had 0 idea who to put in our team

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The only constitutional requirement is that cabinet posts must be made with the advice and consent of the Senate.

[–] Grogon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Okay now I'm gonna by massive amounts of pop corn cause this is gonna get interesting the next weeks.

[–] runiq 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"I confess, I did not know who Pete Hegseth was until about 20 minutes ago," Smith told reporters.

"He does not seem to have much of a detailed background in [Department of Defense] policy. To the extent he’s worked on any of that stuff, it has been on veterans policy, not on DoD issues. So the lack of experience is concerning," Smith said.

“Now I have not heard what his plans are, so we will see what his plans are,” he added. “But it was surprising and is concerning, just given that lack of experience. You know, the Pentagon, biggest bureaucracy in the world. It’s a hard thing to run, so I think it’s going to be a challenge."

In the words of Wash: Oh god, oh god, we're all gonna die.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, but all that won't matter. I'm sure that Trump will simply eliminate large swathes of the DoD, purely because he wants himself to be closest to the actual command structure. All that squad-level command, the "organized chaos" that gives us a lot of tactical flexibility? I'm fairly sure that'll be gone, because Trump doesn't trust anyone but him giving orders now. He's deeply upset he couldn't simply order the military into cities to break up the 2020 protests, so he wants to be the first and only important link in the command chain, with everyone below selected for loyalty, not competence.

Precisely this.

He wants to emulate the command structure of the Russian Army - not because it’s more effective (it’s demonstrably not), but because the power structure is far more linear and top-down, and he doesn’t want any intelligent and conscientious officers or noncoms refusing orders and getting away with it, regardless of whether or not said orders are blatantly illegal.