Streaming bootlegged games is a fast track to legal trouble. I don't blame Nintendo at all here.
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
172 points (97.3% liked)
Games
33029 readers
759 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by:
hot
top
controversial
new
old
Agreed. I hate Nintendo and their scummy tactics just like anyone else, but sadly the law is on their side here. Also, they're known for this. Why would you do this and then double down after they start taking down your content.
I am not on Nintendo's side, but I have zero sympathy for someone who does this to themselves.
Nintendo should hire him to beta test its games. Problem solved.
...why? Pirating games and streaming games don't correlate to skill in testing games.
Sometime a streamer, he show his pre-release to corporation Nintendo and say "You will never get this you will never get it la la la la la la." Nintendo behind its lawyer. Nintendo cries, Nintendo cries and everybody laughs. Streamer goes "You never get this." But one time Nintendo send lawsuit and Nintendo "get this" and then we all laugh. High five!
To all the downvoters....this is a Borat reference...
I have no issues with piracy, but streaming pirated materials is just dumb. Streaming pirated materials of a company that is known for being litigious? Just put your whole dick in the wasp nest.
That's why this is funny.
Amazing response to Nintendo. Get fucked tendo, get fucked. You control nothing
You know, it's okay to recognize Nintendo's scummy legal practices while also recognizing that in this one single instance they are in the right.
IP law is an illegitimate institution, so no they're absolutely not.
Well that's not how the law works, you don't get to violate it just because you don't like it.
That's sovereign citizen BS, and that never ends well for them either.
You understand that arguments about the legitimacy of law is an argument about whether a law should exist rather than if a law does exist, right?
There's a difference between saying that someone's "in the right" (which they're absolutely not) and saying someone is legally capable of doing what they want. (which is debatable)
There comes a point where being right doesn't matter more than the fact that they're cunts.
Streamer sounds like an idiot:
They emailed Nintendo directly about plans to continue doing so;
- They emailed Nintendo about helping folks find new versions of emulators, such as Yuzu and Ryujinx;
There is nothing wrong with emulators. The ROMs themselves, sure. Emulators? Heck no
But there is something wrong with emailing Nintendo to say "No matter what you do, I'm going to help more people pirate your games!"
Whether there is something wrong with doing that is a matter of ethics and personal values…
Regardless of those, it’s profoundly stupid to taunt Nintendo with confessions of piracy and threats to commit more
There's no such thing as being too based.
Based on what?
This dumbass contacted Nintendo to taunt them about how he's gonna stream leaked pirated copies. Hard to have sympathy for this idiot for poking the bear.
It sounds like they actually control quite a lot.
Turns out, when you do something clearly not okay and then actively go and taunt the people who could sue you for it with it, they might just, you know, do that. Since you actually went and asked them about it.
Playing leaked games early. Wow, you have no standards. Just hate for Nintendo.
I mean I think the guy is stupid, but let's honestly reflect here, who gives a fuck about some leaked Nintendo game getting played a week or two early. Like honestly, it might not technically be victimless (though even that can be argued), but the 'damage' is so small it's like being upset that someone stepped on your grass.
I give back what I receive, so in theory..yes.
Id rather see someone play a leaked game early, then have to deal with some corporate garbage trailer that pulls all the stops to deceive it's fans. I'd rather see actual gameplay, from a normal user then the slop they script.
They aren't selling anything, so what does it matter other then tendo can't lie as easily.