this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
77 points (95.3% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3881 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Republican West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice has won the Senate seat previously held by retiring independent Sen. Joe Manchin, NBC News projects.

Justice's victory moves Republicans closer to taking control of the Senate; they now need just one more seat if Democrats retain the White House.

Justice, initially elected as a Democrat in 2016 before switching to the GOP, defeated Democrat Wheeling Mayor Glenn Elliott in a race heavily favored for Republicans.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 77 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Manchin was basically a Republican anyway

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

The judicial picks alone made him a Democrat. The fact that he was willing to work with Dems made him definitively NOT a Republican. Having him was infinitely better than having a Republican.

Manchin is what a Republican SHOULD be.

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He at least gave the Senate majority leadership to the Democrats.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

And then let them do exactly nothing with that majority - thus perpetuating the media talking point that democrats don’t deliver.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Sinking it whenever he felt like it. Seemingly getting worse over time taking more and more for himself.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

If only there was something, like a buster, maybe even fili type buster stopping any forward progress.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 3 points 1 week ago

It was the only positive thing I can tell he did with his seat.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 28 points 1 week ago

I'm sorry. I tried.

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He isn't in great health and apparently misses a lot of legislative sessions. This might not be a long term problem

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He’s 73 but somehow looks even older.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

That thing in the picture is only 73? Damn. That's some impressively bad aging.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Just donate to this dude to switch back to Dems. He's a fair weather grifter anyway