Mozilla Foundation lays off 30% staff, drops advocacy division : firefox

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

Damn, I definitely won't stop donating, if they're this short on money, but that was basically my understanding of what they do, primarily advocacy.

Is MDN and the webstandards work also part of the Foundation? It certainly feels like it'd be more non-profit-y work. I guess, they do hold ownership of the Corporation, so they could also just tell the Corporation to deliver that.

But yeah, I'd like some increased messaging of what other work they do, or how much advocacy they can continue to do. Obviously, that's not an insane number of employees left either way...

[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Curious.

I keep a close eye on the job listings posted to Mozilla's job board. They don't post new job openings very often, so I always want to be tuned in when new listing pop up. All of a sudden, a lot of new job openings have appeared for a company that just laid off 36 people...

Oct 30 2024:

Oct 31 2024:

Fixed Term PR/Communications Manager

Nov 1 2024:

Nov 4 2024:

Nov 5 2024:

Staff Technical Program Manager, Firefox Enhancements

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 hours ago

Those are job postings at the for-profit Mozilla Corporation, the layoffs happened at the non-profit Mozilla Foundation.

They're theoretically connected, in that the Corporation is a subsidiary of the Foundation, but to my knowledge, they practically don't hand money from the Foundation to the Corporation, because the Corporation has magnitudes more money anyways.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 7 points 7 hours ago

Layoffs sometimes mean freeing up salaries for different positions (e.g. a company pivoting). Curious jobs though, not really sure what to read from those tea leaves....

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 50 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

the idea of putting people before profit feels increasingly radical

What. The. Fuck.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago

This is the Mozilla Foundation. They're legally a non-profit, so this isn't supposed to mean that they're reconsidering their stance. They can't do that. It's rather just them saying "shit's hard, yo".

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Probably because of the ad corp they bought

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 hours ago

Nah it's not news that their ethos has been fading away for a long time now and that Mozilla just really isn't what it used to be a decade ago.

[–] renegadespork@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Now that Google isn’t allowed to pay them default search engine money, I think this was expected.

Ideologically I think it’s a good thing the US government is challenging Google’s monopolistic practices. Unfortunately, that money was a massive percentage of Mozilla’s income.

It really was short-sighted of them to put so many eggs into one basket.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 40 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Mozilla frankly could use some serious restructuring. If Brave was able to get a decent market share overnight surely a well known company can make a come back.

Mozilla has a management problem

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago

Brave didn't build a browser. They reskinned Chrome.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

Brave has a notable market share? I've never seen them in any graph.

Comparing the two is also a difficult territory, because Brave does not develop their own browser engine. If Google stops publishing the Chromium source code, they're gone in a few months.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 19 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Hear hear. Trim the fat, and start at the head.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Looks at ladybug

We will watch your career with great interest

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 2 points 7 hours ago

Mozilla is not brave enough for this change.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 hours ago

This is the Mozilla foundation, not the Mozilla corp. The latter has the deal with Google; the former couldn't make that deal even if they wanted to.

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 40 points 10 hours ago

The CEO salary will also get a 30% cut right? Right?

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 25 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

once more, how much does that garbage ceo costs?

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

That CEO is working for the Mozilla Corporation, these layoffs happened at the Mozilla Foundation. The latter is legally a non-profit, so it would be quite limited how much money they could accept from the Corporation anyways.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

$6.9 mil the last time they said. And that was in a year where CEO salary was (on average) cut across all for-profit companies, because even businesses react to market forces sometimes.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

The CEO who got paid that much has quit. We don't yet know what the salary of the new CEO is going to be.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 2 points 7 hours ago

Not enough that its worth.

[–] trk@aussie.zone 11 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

We're gonna end up with a Blink monopoly, aren't we?

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

Either you die young or you live long enough to turn into the Blink engine.mm

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 4 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

My hope is that Mozilla stops working on Firefox and the Linux Foundation creates a new Firefox fork and finances the project. It would be the official Linux browser.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 hours ago

I do not see why you think the Linux Foundation could stomp 500+ devs out of the ground and do a better job. That's three times the size of the current Linux Foundation. Nevermind that the Linux Foundation is purely non-profit. Paying a living wage to that many devs is pretty much just not going to be possible.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 hours ago

The Linux foundation is still trying to take Servo out of the ground

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing stopping them from forking it now

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 4 points 6 hours ago

There is no need to at the moment, that's stopping them. Like with Redis, there was a need to fork it. My hope is that the Linux Foundation does not see any other way than doing it themselves.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I feel bad for the people who were eliminated. The browser has been stagnating for a while now, maybe a smaller team can be more focused on making a better, more modern browser.

The mobile browser is top notch. The desktop browser has been slowly catching up with the basic innovations of other browsers.

They definitely need to find a new source of funding.

[–] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

They need another source of funding, maybe cutting salaries of the Cs would work for one.

I don't think this is them focussing back on the browser, especially looking at the job listings posted in another comment. It seems to me it's just a focus on AI, probably in the hope of making money.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They need to stop bloating the web, so that browser development stops taking billion dollar budgets.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure, Google is at the forefront of that endeavor. Apple has no interest in keeping up. And Mozilla needs to stay in the talks for whatever Google proposes to ensure the webstandard can be implemented by others.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

History questions: which company invented JavaScript?

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

Netscape. Specifically the homophobe guy that's now leading the Chromium-based browser Brave.

I'm being a jackass about it, because that was 28 years ago. You can't say they should stop bloating the web and then bring up an example from before Google even existed.