this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

23409 readers
2787 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

After serving more than a month of in-school suspension over his dreadlocks, a Black student in Texas was told he will be removed from his high school and sent to a disciplinary alternative education program on Thursday.

Darryl George, 18, is a junior at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu and has been suspended since Aug. 31. He will be sent to EPIC, an alternative school program, from Oct. 12 through Nov. 29 for “failure to comply” with multiple campus and classroom regulations, the principal said in a Wednesday letter provided to The Associated Press by the family.

Principal Lance Murphy wrote that George has repeatedly violated the district's “previously communicated standards of student conduct." The letter also says that George will be allowed to return to regular classroom instruction on Nov. 30 but will not be allowed to return to his high school's campus until then unless he's there to discuss his conduct with school administrators.

Barbers Hill Independent School District prohibits male students from having hair extending below the eyebrows, ear lobes or top of a T-shirt collar, according to the student handbook. Additionally, hair on all students must be clean, well-groomed, geometrical and not an unnatural color or variation. The school does not require uniforms.

George's mother, Darresha George, and the family's attorney deny the teenager's hairstyle violates the dress code. The family last month filed a formal complaint with the Texas Education Agency and a federal civil rights lawsuit against the state’s governor and attorney general, alleging they failed to enforce a new law outlawing discrimination based on hairstyles.

The family alleges George's suspension and subsequent discipline violate the state’s CROWN Act, which took effect Sept. 1. The law, an acronym for “Create a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair,” is intended to prohibit race-based hair discrimination and bars employers and schools from penalizing people because of hair texture or protective hairstyles including Afros, braids, dreadlocks, twists or Bantu knots.

A federal version passed in the U.S. House last year, but was not successful in the Senate.

The school district also filed a lawsuit in state district court asking a judge to clarify whether its dress code restrictions limiting student hair length for boys violates the CROWN Act. The lawsuit was filed in Chambers County, east of Houston.

George’s school previously clashed with two other Black male students over the dress code.

Barbers Hill officials told cousins De’Andre Arnold and Kaden Bradford they had to cut their dreadlocks in 2020. Their families sued the district in May 2020, and a federal judge later ruled the district’s hair policy was discriminatory. Their pending case helped spur Texas lawmakers to approve the state’s CROWN Act. Both students withdrew from the school, with Bradford returning after the judge’s ruling.

link: https://www.aol.com/news/black-student-suspended-over-hairstyle-220842177.html

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Texas, in this case, is actually siding with the student through the CROWN-Act that was specifically adopted because of court cases over hairstyles that damn school already lost before.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But I was told America is the land of the free. Have I been misinformed?

[–] Trabic@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whoever told you that is your enemy.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

The finger to the land of the chains

[–] clifftiger@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

If you are already privileged you probably are experiencing freedom.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine being sent to the school with all the unruly and undisciplined kids because of your hairstyle. Crazy and so fucking racist.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't this in Texas or somewhere equally as shitty? They would have sent him to prison for his hair if they could have. School to prison pipeline is real.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Texas passed the CROWN-act to combat hair-based racial discrimination because that very same school already lost two cases where they discriminated black youths because of their hair.

For once Texas is on the right side.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even Texas said this was too far

[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Imagine being more bigoted than Texas

[–] Blastasaurus@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a shithole.

Hope he gets into a college as far away as possible.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's baffling to me, that the US always claims to be the champion of freedom, but runs most of their education like part-time prison camps. My school here in Germany didn't give a crap about anyone's appearance. If you're street legal, you're fine in school.

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man this is one school run by just a few people, all it takes is one goofy bastard to suspend a student. This isn't an "US" issue

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah, because this is the one case where this happened. Never before and nowhere else.

[–] TheActualDevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ooh! I've got a thing about this!

In an Episode of the Youtube series Under the Blacklight, David Blight, a Yale professor brought something up that I think brings the American idea of "freedom" into a different context. He says “This whole new idea of what’s liberty and liberty for whom, can also kill. Especially when it replaces the idea of Liberty as that which has to be shared in some kind of common good.”

The idea isn't really new and is actually deeply rooted in America's past through to it's creation. Freedom should be a group concept in which we maximize freedom for the populace. Instead it's seen as individual freedom only. When you combine this with the idea that freedom is the most important thing, it results in people coming to the conclusion that they are justified in anything in the process of attaining what they want. And they'll use whatever tools they have available to attain this in as straight a path as they can.

America has always been a champion of personal freedom, whatever they say. It's founding was about a bunch of business men who didn't want to pay taxes so they staged a rebellion. There's still a heavy bent against taxes with the main argument being people don't want the government to have any power, but really it's because individuals just want to keep their money while disregarding the ways in which that money would improve the good for all people. At it's core America is a Selfish nation built of selfishness and getting yours before someone else takes it.

It gets more a little complicated when talking about motives of those in power, but boils down to the same, and they retain that power primarily by banging the "personal freedoms" drum.

To quote famed Discworld philosopher Granny Weatherwax,

"There's no grays, only white that's got grubby. I'm surprised you don't know that. And sin, young man, is when you treat people like things. Including yourself. That's what sin is." "It's a lot more complicated than that--" "No. It ain't. When people say things are a lot more complicated than that, they means they're getting worried that they won't like the truth. People as things, that's where it starts." "Oh, I'm sure there are worse crimes--" "But they starts with thinking about people as things..."

Thank you for coming to my TED talk

[–] geissi@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I generally agree that that freedom in the US is mostly seen as 'my personal right to do anything I want'.
But that's exactly what is being restricted here. An individual's personal freedom to wear the hairstyle they want.
So how does that explain the restrictiveness of US schools?

[–] SlikPikker@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Barbers Hill Independent School District prohibits male students from having hair extending below the eyebrows, ear lobes or top of a T-shirt collar, according to the student handbook. Additionally, hair on all students must be clean, well-groomed, geometrical and not an unnatural color or variation. The school does not require uniforms.

Land of the fucking free.

Call me when the HOA allows you to plant clover on the front lawn.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hair in the photo doesn’t even seem to break any of those rules??

The South is quite a disgusting place.

[–] Oszilloraptor@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To be fair it could maybe be counted under unnatural variations.

He is styling it in a way that is not typical for the society he actively participates in.


(second part not necessarily connected to your comment anymore)

But I think it's stupid to ban hair styles anyway. I often had some classmates with weird hairstyles and guess what, didn't distract me from school.

In my opinion the dresscodes for school should be:

  • cover your genitals generously, ass and boobies (regardless of gender. I think there isn't place for shirtless guys in school outside of the gym). In general that means pants/dress/skirt and a shirt/top, but I wouldn't care if they wear a toga or whatever.
  • don't wear extreme political symbols or other obviously widespread offensive symbols (e.g. a swastika)
  • unless absolutely required by your religion, or physical reasons like a burnt face, never wear anything that covers your face. (medical masks in case of illness or pandemics excluded)

And that should be it (this list includes my limitations on hair styles and tattoos as well)

[–] canuckkat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I know the Western world still isn't into it, but kids should be allowed to wear masks if they're sick or trying to prevent illness. Like they do in Asian countries.

Especially by the point they're in high school.

[–] Oszilloraptor@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the input. honestly I forgot about masks, I would allow them as well.

I'm more against wearing a bandana mask for fun and edgyness; or to not be identified if you trash the elevator, etc.

[–] halferect@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Time for the students to protest by having hair that isn't "acceptable." I imagine suspending most of the students won't go over well

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What does geometric even mean? Cubes? Dodecahedrons?

Can we call it a dodecahedron-o-do?

Edit: kids should start styling their hair into cubes, in protest. “The rules say it must be geometrical!”

[–] Hupf@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Basically, take Ramiel's hairstyle as an example.

Fuck, dude, that is painfully racist of the school.