this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

20688 readers
1170 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Re-creation of someone else's post because the original was removed and I found it funny when I first saw it

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The duck can't actually say anything because his sound drivers randomly stopped working.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

PipeWire for life

[–] HeyMrDeadMan@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I'm really triggered by the idea that Linux makes running old software easy. The bane of my existence is finding an application that depends on libButts.5.1, but my distro ships with libButts.5.3, which isn't backward compatible for some reason, and trying to install libButts.5.1 bricks the desktop environment for some reason.

[–] red@sopuli.xyz 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Today I spent 50 minutes figuring out why my app could not set itself as default for www.instagram.com links. I don't have IG installed.

Turns out the latest Samsung OTA update re-enabled Meta App Manager, Meta App Installer and Meta Services. Any of which, while enabled, will result in the user setting an app to handle certain domain links, only for the users action to be instantly reversed without notification.

Edit: that's a gif if it doesn't show up correctly. I had an app advertise itself as IG but Meta kept hijacking the link handler. An uninstallable Samsung forced Meta app, that enables itself back after each OTA update.

If this was on desktop, someone would already be sued. But android? "Sorry can't uninstall system app"

[–] Krachsterben@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's a Samsung issue, not Android specifically

[–] red@sopuli.xyz 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'd call it an Android issue, as the OS lets vendors force uninstallable apps into their devices.

[–] Krachsterben@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You don't get it. Samsung modifies Android to the extent that it's barely recognisable anymore. If you want to experience a pure Android experience, get a Google Pixel or flash your own ROM

Samsung's software is garbage and the main reason I will never buy their phones no matter how great their hardware is

[–] red@sopuli.xyz 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The difference is, Samsung isn't able to modify for example their Windows devices like this, which is why I say the root issue lives in the OS level. It's one thing to bundle vendor software in, it's another when that OS has a feature in which you only let the owner of the device disable, not uninstall, said software.

[–] Krachsterben@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

That's because windows is closed source, duh. The beauty of Android is that you have the option to flash the version you want. You just choose to stick with the worst out of all Android versions and then complain about it lol

You're like a boomer complaining about Internet Explorer being slow

[–] Nobsi@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"I can't build a steady userbase"

[–] markon@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Actually.... The Steam Deck runs on Valve's custom Arch Linux. To say there is no steady userbase is simply not true.

[–] Nobsi@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Touché. I would like to counter that with "Not a desktop though" and end my turn with "wine required to use company software"

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

that's also not true because it could be used as a desktop all the same

[–] Nobsi@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It is very true. Nobody buys a steamdeck to be a desktop replacement. Nobody does work on a steamdeck. It might theoretically work, but most steamdeck owners game on it and thats it.

[–] HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I dont think you're right about that. Browse through the steam deck subreddit and community here and you'll see plenty of posts of people using the steam deck for work and productivity as well as gaming. I myself use it both as a console and as a laptop more or less. Its a very nice portable Linux desktop

[–] Nobsi@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago
[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Between Microsoft's open source Vulcan enhancements and Valve's everything else enhancements both being contributed upstream, "Wine required" doesn't have quite the same punch it used to.

Pours myself a shot for having to thank Microsoft

[–] Nobsi@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Weak punches are still punches

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Nobsi@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

My dreams don't hurt :(

[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You can't delete system apps on Android, but you can disable the ones that won't break your phone if they're disabled. I currently have Chrome, the Play Store (and, at least to an extent, Google Play Services), YouTube, and YouTube Music all disabled.

[–] noobnarski@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

Well if you root your phone you can definetly delete any app.

[–] nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The last character: I can make you spend an entire day trying to install some software or configuring something specific

[–] Black616Angel@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, I never had to do this on windows!

Wait! That's not correct.

[–] Abnorc@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe I’m unique in this regard, but I can’t remember having any issues installing things on windows since Windows 7. Trying out Linux in college was fun and interesting, but I definitely spent more time futzing around with it to make it work the way that I want it to work.

I think more people would take the Linux community here seriously if people just acknowledged the flaws with Linux based OSes and focused on the actual benefits of Linux over windows. (Which are getting more and more enticing as Microsoft makes windows more annoying.)

[–] Black616Angel@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

I know what you mean and Linux can be the operating system with less issues as well. E.g. I never had printer issues with my system but have to troubleshoot others' printers regularly.

If you only use Linux for browsing and light office work you probably never encounter problems. Even if you play games via steam and Proton there probably will never be something.

The same is true for Windows. If you only use it for a small subset of tasks (browsing, light office work or playing recent games) you will rarely encounter problems.

But if you try to do so without a Microsoft account or if you don't want a bloated start menu, it starts to get tricky.

And don't get me started on playing old games or getting some programming dependencies running. This can be hell.

I know the flaws of windows (I've used it up until last year and still have to use it at work) and I also know the limitations of Linux. They are both not perfect, but Linux is free and Windows becomes more and more shit (as you've said). And this is where I don't understand all the people saying, that windows is easier. It really isn't anymore. It was a few years ago though.