this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
205 points (98.1% liked)

World News

38797 readers
1818 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Defence ministry fits anti-tank barriers and ‘fortifications which will be supported by firepower to stop and destroy the enemy’

Lithuania has installed “dragon’s teeth” anti-tank barriers on bridges that link the country to Russia.

Its defence ministry also said “firepower” had been built around another fortified bridge over the Neman River to stop a potential Russian attack.

“Fortifications will be supported by firepower, in case it’s needed, to stop and destroy the enemy,” it said.

The Neman River forms part of Lithuania’s border with Russia’s Kaliningrad exclave. It is 580 miles long and flows from Belarus through Lithuania and then into the North Sea.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Lithuania installs ‘dragon’s teeth’

They gon' have to set up some laser and flame turrets next.
I played Factorio, so I noe.

Brrrrrrrrr.

[–] SandySocks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

My dumbass thought that was an aerial photo

[–] ELO@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

almost choked on my sandwich lmao

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

That's pretty smart, more countries should do this.

Ounce of prevention.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 29 points 1 day ago (6 children)

In a world of satellites, advanced air forces, guided missiles, drones, etc, a couple spiky things on the ground seems very medieval.

[–] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago

Perhaps. But expanding ones borders through conquest also seems medieval, and guided missiles are poor tools for holding territory, so the classics still have a role to play.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago

You'd be surprised how much of modern warfare is pretty medieval in a way.

When I was in the army, that sort of comment was pretty common in the earlier lecturers.

Basically boils down to limited resources. Not everyone in the military gets to have those toys, and armies still need to get their troops in if they want to invade, and building roads and bridges is pretty inefficient when there's roads. And if those roads have spiky things which prevent tanks from moving, well, then... gonna have to deal with that.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 30 points 1 day ago

And yet a glance at how the Russian army is equipped...

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Modern warfare seems to be very similar to world war two style warfare. Just with the things you listed added ontop. It’s not like they replaced the warfare.

For instance the war in ukraine includes Blitzkrieg combined arms type offensives, world war 1 type trench warfare, soviet type attrition warfare, and some of the most modern drone and missile warfare.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Pretty much is.

They're just designed to slow down the movement of troops. They can be dealt with fairly easily, but you do have to move them out of the way before you can move vehicles across. This buys a little extra time.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

All the fancy tech in the world doesn't help you take and hold land. That takes plain old boots on the ground.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dragon's teeth! That's what Putin should have used to increase his declining troop numbers!

[–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, a fellow enjoyer of greek mythology!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

I knew I couldn't fleece everyone here.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is theater. Kaliningrad has a land border with Lithuania, but not with Russia. Invading from there would require a buildup that would be obvious and create logistics that would be insane. If Russia moves tanks to Kaliningrad, it'll be through Lithuania.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago

Kaliningrad has a land border with Lithuania, but not with Russia

You do realise that Koenigsberg is, at least for now, part of Russia?

I see they’re playing the “turtle” strat.