LinkedinLunatics

I would reject this pull request. Why is the indenting all over the place? Why is your keyword capitalisation all over the place? WHY YELLOW?!

Edit: the more I look at this the more it pisses me off. Wtf is going on with your kerning? Just random number and placement of spaces. Also, why is the table name in caps? Who does that? Select * is lazy. Do you really need every field about a girl? Really? Worst of all, not a limited request. I sware this is just the kind of thing that would return 30 million rows and brick the database for twenty seconds.

Guy with a belly asks for girl with a small waist. The half-assed ugly shirt will do it.

Instant woman repellant.

At least he's wearing the red flag on the outside.

One of the reasons women will find this repugnant is because they didn't normalize their tables. Should be boyfriend_id is null.

ERROR: permission denied for "GIRLS"

I can already imagine a 40-something year old manager coming into work wearing this

The pallette for the syntax highlighter is horrid. Hardly readable.

Should be age > (my_age / 2) +7

Who says programmers don't have a sense of humor?

No one. It's just what you pretend people say to make yourself feel like some kind of special exception.

This is why we have codes of conduct.

~~and smallwaist = true~~

and itty_bitty_waist = true

and round_thing_in_your_face = true

shitty taste <> "humor"

Gonna sound racist but deal with it.

I constantly meet asian developers (Singapore , India, China, etc) with this edgelord personality. They come to American conferences and meetups, say some wild sexist shit, and someone has to politely let them know not to.

Some backtrack. Some apologize. Some literally freeze up and pretend like it didn't happen.

This is not funny and any man wearing this would probably not pass a similar test using any woman's criteria. If I saw someone wearing this my first thought would certainly not be "hey this is a guy with a great sense of humor and I would like to hang with him!".

Most SQL Dbs use bits, so it would be WHERE field = 1

The entire shirt caused me 4d6 psychological damage.

He forgot the "TOP 2" qualifier.

most infurating part of this is the mixing of cases

🙄🤦‍♂️

This is the most Indian shit I have seen this week.