this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
138 points (93.7% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2059 readers
6 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] errer@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago

And nothing of value was lost

[–] Subtracty@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

This makes sense. With all the great tv shows getting canceled before they even have a chance to develop, I think it is only fair that something this lackluster suffer the same fate.

[–] blackluster117@possumpat.io 22 points 3 days ago

Ah, so there's at least one good thing that came from Max removing a bunch of cartoons from the platform. Not exactly equivalent exchange, but I'll take the dubs where I can.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 21 points 3 days ago (7 children)

It wasn’t great but it also wasn’t half as bad as the internet said.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 60 points 3 days ago

I only have one criteria. Either I enjoy watching a show, or I don't enjoy it. This thing caused me psychological pain in just the first 10 minutes. I think it was at least half as bad as the worst reviews called it.

[–] ELO@piefed.social 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I just recently defected from reddit for the umpteenth time and it is so wild to see how normal these comments are compared to the cesspool I've gotten so used to. I was ready to delve into how abhorrently bad the show was via the comments, only to find normal people!

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 15 points 3 days ago

get used to it.

also, sometimes you have a good response to a thread and it isn't already the top comment with thousands of upvotes and you actually get to post it.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago

The Way Life's Meant to Be.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Bad media happens all the damn time. The degree to which this got singled out was always just weird.

The true measure of progress is when media featuring minorities can flop and not be a bigger deal than all the other flops starring white men.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Personally I thought it was the sexualization of these teenagers that was the problem.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago

A rare take on Lemmy lol. I agree, it was a completely odd tone compared to the original.

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah that's kinda how I feel about The Acolyte. Liked parts of it, but most was just kinda lame but not really a big deal as everyone else making it out to be. Things just suck sometimes.

[–] PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

The main problem is just that a lot of this stuff is being tied to huge, (generally) well-remembered franchises so there is more eyes on it, and its directly comparing itself to better works. For example, The Acolyte might be okay by the standards of being just another sci-fi show, or as a fanfiction where the expectations are lower, but not when it puts itself alongside other main-line entries like the original trilogy, or even something modern like The Mandalorian.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I thought the consensus was pretty accurate.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah, that was my take too. Interesting, and decent overall with no real high points, but it wasn't some kind of horrible show at all. Just kinda meh, more of a fanfic idea than a real show.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Didn't know it existed.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 11 points 3 days ago

Ohh nooooooo.........

[–] Chenzo@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Dang, beat me to it.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago
[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Oh no. I'm so sad I'll make sure to never watch it.

[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Twas ass anyhow

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I thought Scrappy Doo was a bad idea. I REALLY like projects that stick to the source material.

There's a REASON that this was popular enough you wanted to make it again. Don't change it. That's stupid.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is only tangentially related to what you just said, but I find adaptations fascinating because of how permeable the concept of "staying true to the source material" is.

One of the best examples I can think of is the animated movie Nimona, based on a graphic novel (that started as a webcomic) by N.D. Stevenson. The movie changes a heckton from the graphic novel, but in a way that arguably leads to a more authentic adaptation of the "soul" of the graphic novel. An example from the inverse is Shyamalan's adaptation of Avatar: The Last Airbender: there were parts that were copied over, shot for shot, from the animated show, and even this segments that closely followed the source material just didn't work — things that worked in animation don't work in live action and vice versa.

I don't think there's any one interpretation of what the "soul" of a piece of media is, but watching Velma was perplexing because I wondered whether Kaling had actually wanted to make an adapted spin-off, or whether this was a completely separate show that later had a Scooby Doo veneer put on top. I wish I could've better understood what her vision was, because I can't see what, if anything, resonated with Kaling from the original media.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I can’t see what, if anything, resonated with Kaling from the original media