this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
231 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2060 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's also a bit weird that this is politically relevant in the US. I honestly don't understand how my need for healthcare is a political stance.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because money.

Not that hard to understand.

[–] Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ok, but the military costs money but isn't political.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Trump keeps making it political and also wants to massively cut taxes on the group of people who contribute the most in taxes that pay for the military - millionaires, billionaires, and major corporations. While also slashing healthcare for millions.

Just like he did last time.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So you're saying both parties agree on the massive military spending and it's not political?

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Passes to massive bipartisan support each time and your only source is shit trump said.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You criticize popular legislation that actually accomplishes what you demand, then whine about what your candidate says—

Are you feeling ok? Lol

[–] trite_kitten@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

But you see, it’s not a political stance because no one who even has a chance to win even remotely feels the need to offer that to their voters.

[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I work in healthcare and I’m all for socialized medicine or Medicare for all. The corporate hospitals do not act in the best interests of the patients. Some of them (like HCA) are inherently evil. They cut staffing, resources, and supplies to the bone, constantly running on the thinnest of margins leading to dangerously unsafe conditions for patients. Not to mention doctors, providers, nurses, and other healthcare workers are getting completely burned out. This is so they can please the shareholders and the executives can get their fat bonuses. Americans pay so much for healthcare and get so little in return.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's fucked up there's no option to vote for who actually wants to fix it.

Kamala was headed in the right direction 5 years ago, but now I dont even know if she admits the current system am is flawed now.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's sad that the best response to Trump's bizarre accusation of "she wants to give everyone health care" would be "fuck yeah I do!" but she for some reason thinks it will scare off swing voters and leans into the classic Dem instinct of tucking to the center.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

would be “fuck yeah I do!”

I'm not a huge fan of Pete, but at least he's smart enough to have learned that lesson from Bernie.

He goes on Faux all the time these days and when they call him a communist, he explains what the policy actually means.

The vast majority of our country want healthcare improved. And I stead of capitalizing on it, were letting trump be the only one who talks about fixing it. Knowing that half the voters are dumb enough to believe him

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't want to link the same clip over and over but Bernie getting the whole Fox News Town Hall crowd to agree with him should have been the eye opener for the whole fucking party, not just mayor Pete.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There’$ a very good rea$on that that clip i$ completely buried by corporate media.

I’ll let you gue$$ what that rea$on i$.

[–] abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've never seen this - but I'd love to!

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The whole thing is probably out there somewhere but this is the classic clip.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because everyone believes the lie that socialized healthcare would be terrible because the corporate media is complicit in spreading it since forever. And they always will be, since the same people who owned the corporate media are also heavily invested in corporate healthcare.

At least Harris is still kinda trending in the right direction, even if moving in smaller steps, https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4832005-kamala-harris-level-up-biden-admin-health-care-programs/

Compared with the other side that wants to drop protections for preexisting conditions.

there’s no option to vote for who actually wants to fix it.

This makes me jealous of the folks who get to vote for Sanders and AOC back into Congress again.

Kamala was headed in the right direction 5 years ago, but now I dont even know if she admits the current system is flawed now.

The best I can hope for here is that, since in the past she was for fixing it, that once the election is past then she'll "show her true colors" and get around to it again.

Anyone planning on moving to Canada?

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 months ago

Canada posting higher on this report than the US, meanwhile the US constantly talks down on the quality of care in Canada, and conservatives use the Canada-US comparison to try and sell Canadians on privatized health care.

Don't worry US, at this rate you won't be in last place for much longer.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

NBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for NBC News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/us-health-care-ranking-report-last-rcna171652?cid=sm_in
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support