this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
38 points (89.6% liked)

movies

1789 readers
180 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When Beetlejuice first hit cinemas in 1988, it was a weird, wonderful, and wildly original experience. Tim Burton’s dark yet playful aesthetic, Michael Keaton’s chaotic performance as the titular ghost, and the film’s quirky humor combined to create something truly special. Beetlejuice became a cult classic, a film that embodied Burton’s trademark balance of the macabre and the whimsical while introducing a unique world that spawned an equally unique and dedicated fandom.

Now, more than 35 years later, the Beetlejuice sequel has arrived, and like so many remakes before it, it’s struggling to capture the essence that made the original so beloved.

The sequel brings everything you would expect in the way of nostalgia but also an influx of brand partnerships: a whopping 35 in total. While brand collaborations are nothing new, Beetlejuice 2 has taken cues from the successful marketing strategy of Barbie, leveraging creative partnerships that aim to enhance the viewer’s experience. The key phrase being ‘aim to’.

The film has been criticized for tipping the balance, with some fans feeling the brand integrations are too heavy-handed. This turns the movie into more of a commercial showcase than a sequel that speaks honestly to a dedicated fandom that has embraced the original for decades.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I honestly didn't notice. 🤷‍♂️

[–] Steve@communick.news 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Me neither. Just had fun watching a fun movie.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I haven't seen this movie yet, but I'm apparently blind to product placement. You could have ten laptops on screen for whatever reason and I would only register that they're laptops. Someone else would have to point out the brand plastered on it for me to notice.

Personally I think it's more distracting if they make up a fake but similar brand in movies.

[–] Steve@communick.news 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One of my favorite movies is Josie and the Pussy Cats. Check it out. If you can't see the product placement, you might be literally blind.

And if you watch to the end, you'll understand the product placement is part of the pointof the movie.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Something like that is different, when the movie makes a point of it.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I assume Wayne's World still got their cut from Pepsi, Advil and Dominos.

[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Garth dressed head to toe Reebok:

"It's like some people only do things because they get paid. And that just makes me sad"

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

I'm sure they did.

[–] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

The only time it really sticks out to me is when your character goes to Bing for their search needs.

[–] Panron@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's a surprising number. Especially so since I don't really recall any blatant product placements (well ok, I think there was one scene that stood out a little bit).

I'd say the number of brand partnerships is less a problem than how prominent those brands are displayed. I can't think of the exact movies off the top of my head, but the most egregious instances I can think of only had one or two brands. Apple and BMW, for example, have had some seriously obnoxious brand placements in movies.

[–] Crewman@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Was it Jurassic World where they basically had an in movie commercial for Jeep or BMW?

Edit: I looked it up, it was Mercedes.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well that brand integration was obviously a success 😂

[–] Crewman@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I guess? But when ads get that obnoxious, it just makes me dislike the product.

Hulu ads have made me hate everything I see on it.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

It depends how well they've done it. James Bond talking about his watch was a super clunky one as I remember, but Bond and Aston Martin just makes sense for the character.

[–] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 6 points 2 months ago

The Corridor Crew with their series VFX Artists React looked at a 2004 motorcycle film called Torque. Its basically someone trying to cash in on the Fast and the Furious but with motorbikes.

Anyway, in the clips they showed, there was some ever so subtle product placement.

Can you spot it?

😂