this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
1100 points (97.7% liked)

Political Memes

5477 readers
2570 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Get Out The Vote ALL 50 States

Use these links to find your state Election Board.

PLEASE Reblog & share to other sites

Alabama https://myinfo.alabamavotes.gov/

Alaska https://voterregistration.alaska.gov/

Arizona https://voter.azsos.gov/VoterView/Home.do

**Arkansas **No State registration page. Commissioners by County. http://www.arkansas.gov/sbec/election-commissioner

California https://voterstatus.sos.ca.gov/

Colorado https://www.coloradosos.gov/pubs/elections/main.html?menuheaders=5

Connecticut https://voterregistration.ct.gov/OLVR/welcome.do

D.C. https://www.dcboe.org/Voters/Register-To-Vote/Register-to-Vote/

Delaware https://ivote.de.gov/voterlogin.aspx

Florida https://registration.elections.myflorida.com/CheckVoterStatus

Georgia https://registertovote.sos.ga.gov/GAOLVR/welcome.do#no-back-button

Hawaii https://olvr.hawaii.gov/

Idaho https://idahovotes.gov/

Illinois https://ova.elections.il.gov/RegistrationLookup.aspx

Indiana https://www.rockthevote.org/voting-information/indiana/

Iowa https://sos.iowa.gov/elections/voterreg/regtovote/search.aspx

Kansas https://myvoteinfo.voteks.org/VoterView

Kentucky https://vrsws.sos.ky.gov/VIC/

Louisiana https://voterportal.sos.la.gov/VoterRegistration

Maine https://www.maine.gov/sos/cec/elec/voter-info/index.html

Maryland https://voterservices.elections.maryland.gov/VoterSearch

Massachusetts https://www.sec.state.ma.us/VoterRegistrationSearch/MyVoterRegStatus.aspx

Michigan https://www.michigan.gov/sos/elections

Minnesota https://mnvotes.sos.state.mn.us/VoterStatus.aspx

Mississippi https://www.msegov.com/sos/voter_registration/amiregistered/Search

Missouri https://s1.sos.mo.gov/elections/VoterLookup/

Montana https://app.mt.gov/voterinfo/

Nebraska https://www.votercheck.necvr.ne.gov/VoterView/

Nevada https://www.nvsos.gov/votersearch/

New Hampshire https://sos.nh.gov/elections/information/notices/voter-registration-motor-vehicle-law-jointly-issued-faqs/

New Jersey http://www.njelections.org/

New Mexico https://voterportal.servis.sos.state.nm.us/wheretovote.aspx?&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1

New York https://voterlookup.elections.ny.gov/

North Carolina https://vt.ncsbe.gov/RegLkup/

North Dakota https://vip.sos.nd.gov/PortalListDetails.aspx?ptlhPKID=51&ptlPKID=7

Ohio https://voterlookup.ohiosos.gov/voterlookup.aspx

Oklahoma https://oklahoma.gov/elections/ovp.html

Oregon https://sos.oregon.gov/voting-elections/Pages/default.aspx

Pennsylvania https://www.pavoterservices.pa.gov/pages/voterregistrationstatus.aspx

Rhode Island https://vote.sos.ri.gov/

South Carolina https://info.scvotes.sc.gov/eng/voterinquiry/VoterInformationRequest.aspx?PageMode=VoterInfo

South Dakota https://vip.sdsos.gov/vipLogin.aspx

Tennessee https://tnmap.tn.gov/voterlookup/

Texas https://teamrv-mvp.sos.texas.gov/MVP/mvp.do

Utah https://vote.utah.gov

Vermont https://sos.vermont.gov/elections/voters/registration/

Virginia https://vote.elections.virginia.gov/VoterInformation

Washington https://weiapplets.sos.wa.gov/MyVote/#/login

West Virginia https://services.sos.wv.gov/Elections/Voter/AmIRegisteredToVote

Wisconsin https://myvote.wi.gov/en-us/FindMyPollingPlace

Wyoming http://soswy.state.wy.us/Elections/RegisteringToVote.aspx

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 138 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This whole cycle is giving me huge 2016 flashbacks.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 97 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The race is significantly tighter than in 2016, at least per the polling. Mostly, people are excited because its such a vast improvement from the Biden polls that had Trump winning in a landslide.

But folks on Lemmy don't realize how hard-in-the-paint rightwing talk radio is currently going for Trump. The degree to which "Haitian migrants eating your dog!" and "Venezuelan terrorists have seized a condo in Colorado!" rhetoric has inundated the discourse can't be overstated. People are taking this shit seriously and sincerely thanks to the breathless bombardment of migrant panic stories crashing over the news networks like a tsunami.

If I didn't know better, I might suspect there's a collaboration among arch-conservative megadonors and media organizations to saturate news networks with this fearmongering. I can't think of any instance in which a news network spewing anti-immigrant sentiment to whip locals into a panicked frenzy has ever happened before, or what the consequences were, but I'm sure that's not what is happening this time and even if it is everything will be fine.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Thank the deregulation of the 80's and 90's, coupled with the internet making it easier than ever to access anything and everything.

It used to be that spreading falsehoods or political bias on network TV or the airwaves via radio could get your station's license revoked by the FCC. But Reagan killed the Fairness Doctrine, and with that out of the way, there were no barriers for Rush Limbaugh and similar ilk to make more money by saying whatever kept the hyper-conservative, over-religious pearl clutches tuning in.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

But Reagan killed the Fairness Doctrine

I have mixed feelings about the Fairness Doctrine, because the practical consequence of the rule only ever seemed to give you a narrow "moderate liberal says X, moderate conservative says Y" corporately approved view. Hard to look at the modern media landscape and think to myself "Damn, if only we had more episodes of Crossfire to fix this".

But yes, after the Fairness Doctrine, you saw an absolute flood of Rush-tier content that could blast uncontested bullshit all over the airwaves endlessly. The FCC went limp and allowed this to roll over the country.

I might also throw in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which started a Katamari-esque consolidation of local radio and tv networks into the modern Clear Channel and Sinclair Media mega-monopolies. A big reason why Rush was a household name by the late '00s stemmed from all these local stations being force-fed his syndicated content, which was blasted practically 24/7 in rotation with a handful of other right-wing talking heads. This guy was cranking out three hours of content a day five days a week, and the shows would play back-to-back on a loop morning, noon, and night.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You're spot on that it wasn't perfect, and it especially falls apart when you look at the politicization of science and objective facts. E.g. climate change should not be a debate, so there should be no obligation to humor a talking head with an R next to their name who is there to "refute" climate change every time a story is run about it.

So on principle, I can't say I love the idea that the Fairness Doctrine required a good bit of oversimplistic "both sides" nonsense. But in practice, it wasn't the media personalities spreading politicized pseudoscience who ended up deplatformed with the law's removal—the opposite ended up happening. Having realized that sensationalism sells, the "alternative facts" crowd are now the only voice in the room for a lot of clueless people. And I think that's the outcome Republicans wanted when they did away with it.

In the absence of a better system today, I can't say I wouldn't like to see it make a return. I'd prefer it if there was still a legal obligation for all of these media outlets to platform at least one sane person.

Also right that it wasn't just the removal of the Fairness Doctrine that led to where we are now, appreciate the other examples (and for a bit of a twist, it was under the Clinton administration that the Telecommunications Act was signed).

[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Fuck, why is it that almost everything that is bad in the US can be traced back to Reagan. It’s unbelievable

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. 2016 was traumatic AF. Let’s be careful out there!

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 months ago

I’m still trying not to think about it as it dominates my thoughts. Holy shit.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 73 points 2 months ago

Check your registration! Many states have been doing voter purges to try to stop you from exercising your right to vote.

[–] Txmyx 48 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You guys need a real democracy. This is just madness

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Do Americans even realise that in other countries that isn't north korea or russia, the president or representative of the country isn't treated like a popstar?

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Of course we do. The problem is that those that understand are drowned out by loud incoherence of holding on to the past. If you have ONE thing you disagree about it's over. There is no more of an intelligent discourse. It turns into a sling fest of who is more right and we all lose.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Everyone I know thinks our two party system is shit, but at the same time they think we are stuck with it and that it is a waste of time to worry about things we can't change.

They're wrong. We could change it if we all collectively demanded a better system. We are only powerless because we choose to believe we are powerless.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 42 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I mean iirc Hilary won the popular vote, no? The issue is our dumbass electorial college situation

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The Republicans have won the presidency three times this century, but have only won the popular vote once, on George W. Bush’s second campaign in 2004. The Electoral College screwed us over in 2000 (Bush vs Gore) and 2016 (Trump vs Clinton).

The Deomocrats have also won the presidency three times this century, but also carried the popular vote every time they did. (Also, every time they won, Joe Biden has been on the ticket…)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] j_elgato@leminal.space 15 points 2 months ago

It's not dumb. The EC is working exactly as designed.

The EC is the fulcrum that allows the rich and powerful to bypass the will of the people by applying only minimal effort and expense.

Built to appease a former slave state, oppressing us all through the amplification of like 18 fucking red necks in one rural Georgia county...

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Yes and No. Yes she won the popular vote, by close to 3 million, but No not in the “swing states” that had been considered “safe”. A margin of 10,000 votes in ~~Wisconsin~~ Michigan? Something like that. Anyway, part of that was Democrats seeing she’s a shoo-in and not bothering to vote.

You Could Fit All the Voters Who Cost Clinton the Election in a Mid-Size Football Stadium

This latest number comes from Decision Desk’s final tally of Pennsylvania’s votes, where Trump won 2,961,875 votes to Clinton’s 2,915,440, a difference of 46,435 votes. Add that to the official results out of Wisconsin, where Clinton lost by 22,177 votes, and Michigan, which she lost by 10,704 votes, and there you have it: 0.057 percent of total voters cost Clinton the presidency.

Electoral College is absolutely the Fuckery Factor though, that's true.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Please remember... national polls mean nothing as we do not have national elections!

[–] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in 2016. Donald Trump was illegitimately placed into power by a corrupt and broken electoral system. That was the real stolen election. Same with Bush v Gore.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Not quite the same as Bush V. Gore because they stopped the counting in Florida.

Had Florida been accurately counted, Gore won. This wasn't discovered until it was too late.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/jan/29/uselections2000.usa

In Clinton's case, she legit lost enough states to lose the electoral college, no recount would have helped her.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

If you use mail-in voting in Pennsylvania, PA supreme Court ruled that ballots with missing or invalid dates on the envelope can be thrown out.

You can track mail-in ballots here:

https://www.pavoterservices.pa.gov/Pages/BallotTracking.aspx

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I said this a ton for the 2020 election, and will scream it until my lungs give out for this one...

...anything other than vote for Harris is a vote for the orange turd. And with the crap they've already passed coupled with the shit that's been leaked...there is a good chance that if she doesn't win this may be the last free election

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Remember Remember the 5th of November, So there's hopefully no gunpowder treason or plot

[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It would be fun to burn effigies of Trump as a holiday though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

You're making it sound like one of the candidates wants to dismantle the american quasi-democracy and rule as a dictator, where on earth did you get that idea?

What, just because one of the candidates has loudly and proudly proclaimed that they indend to start their term by ruling as a dictator?

And because that same candidate has said "In four years, you don't have to vote again, we'll have it fixed so good you're not going to have to vote."?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (10 children)

If only the popular vote mattered...

Hillary wasn't focused on the electoral college, she cared about beating Obama's vote totals to "prove" she should have beat him. So she prioritized the popular vote when campaigning, causing idiots to think she was going to win. Because normally if popular is that high. It's implied battlegrounds are safe too. Because that's the metric that matters and what campaigns should be focusing on.

Hillary just skipped caring about battlegrounds, went straight to popular, and declared that made her winner...

Like, statistically the NFL team that wins the Super Bowl is the one that scores the most touchdowns. But if one team scores 1 TD and the other gets 17 field goals, the team with the most TDs lost.

She focused on correlation, not causation.

Because of that trump became president.

Blame anyone dumb enough to give a shit about a national poll a week out from an election. Then realize a lot of Clinton's 2016 campaign people are inexplicably now running Kamala's campaign and the DNC.

We need to get rid of all those people who haven't understood American politics for decades, they're just the only other option besides trump so it still works despite them sometimes.

But they clearly have no idea what the fuck they're doing.

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That was apparent to my unqualified eyes. You could see it where she was campaigning. Trump was all over contested states. She stuck to the sure things.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Yep.

Anyone that mentioned it got called a trumpet...

Same thing was happening with Biden this time, but luckily they listened this time

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] aramis87@fedia.io 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Comey is from an era where upholding institutions was considered paramount. In that moment, that’s what he was trying to accomplish and he felt that it was in the nation’s greatest interest to do that.

Obviously it backfired. Comey is not a fan of Donald Trump and he later said that he was likely subconsciously influenced by Clinton’s win was a near-certainty.

He shouldn’t be criticized for his attempt at being impartial and promoting transparency.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Even if he broke DoJ policy to reveal Clinton was under investigation, and didn't mention that Trump was also under investigation? He should have done either both or neither.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

He should have done either both or neither.

You’re probably right.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Total side note because I could find anything on it. Why is it "Get Out The Vote" and not "Get Out To Vote"?

The popular one doesn't seem to make grammatical sense, is this some older form of grammar hanging around in a popular slogan?

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

"Get out to vote" is a direct instruction. It means you personally should go and vote.

"Get out the vote" means you should get everyone else out to vote. "Vote" is being used as a mass noun that you want to make as large as possible -by getting it out and making sure people turn up.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Oooooooooh, yes thank you. This will stop bothering me now 😌

[–] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 17 points 2 months ago

Two of the most difficult fuckwits to look at. To listen to. To hear about. JFC

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

hawk tuah the polls and vote on that thang

[–] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 6 points 2 months ago

Thanks, please never say that again

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Trump looks so young in this photo, I forgot.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty positive this is a bullshit meme and that bloomberg poll was from mid June of 2016.

The polls tightened at the end, especially following Comey's October Surprise.

Nevertheless, we should fight like we're 10 points behind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wilshire@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

I'm waiting on my ballot here in Germany

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If you live in a swing state, or can temp relocate to a swing state, and want to get paid for progressive outreach (who really has the luxury to volunteer? Not me..) Check out https://www.theoutreachteam.net/jobs

I’ve worked with them in 2020 and presently. That link doesn’t give me any bonuses, but they do have recruitment incentives if you have friends to get involved. Pay is decent, and they offer insurance on day 1. It’s obviously a limited term contract, but if you need funds, it’s a great way to get income and make a difference at the same time!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I already know how this will pan out. Trump will lose the popular vote but get the electoral college - or at the very least claim to.

The fact that even polling is so close is tremendously disappointing. In 2016 people could claim ignorance on how a Trump presidency would play out. No one has that excuse in 2024 anymore.

I pray for the US of A but I'm afraid the battle was already lost long ago. All of this is just for optics. Illusion of choice and all that.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

I'm afraid it's going to be very, very messy, as every red state will call into question any results other than Trump winning.

load more comments
view more: next ›