A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
So, like none of these folk read The Running Man then?
Or many of the hundred times this idea has been used in Sci-fi.
This was my first version:
I'd buy that for a dollar!
Exquisite.
Also the first twin stick arcade game I played.
And that is pretty much just a ripoff of the movie The Running Man.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/battle_royale
I wouldn't be surprised if the theme also showed up in books that predate all of these films.
Battle Royale is about kids killing each other, not being killed in the course of competitive trials.
If anything, Hunger Games is a bigger culprit for that.
We could quibble about the details, but all of them are fundamentally last-man-standing competitions.
The Hunger Games was indeed one of them. I didn't mention it because it's the most obvious one in current cultural memory (no need for me to point it out) and because Battle Royale came a decade earlier, and Battle Royal half a century before that. The characters' situation is probably older than printed words.
Even if a competitive game format was unique to the Hindi film, it would be tough to argue that nobody else could have thought of that detail when making their own variation of the same theme. Calling it a "blatant rip-off" of Luck (2009) is quite a stretch.
(Incidentally, the Luck synopsis that I read says it focuses on gambling, not competitive trials or children's games. A quick look at the video confirms it.)
Remind me again where Fortnite and Hunger Games got the ideal for Battle Royale stories.
PUBG?
the hindi film industry is itself littered with corpses of stolen ideas from other film industries across the world for decades now.
seems karma's come home to roost if this story is true.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Also pretty terrible to blame one dude for the faults of an entire national industry.
nobody's saying either wrong is right. nobody's blaming the one dude.
as an indian, i've always cringed at movies like baazi, kaante, aatank hi aatank, hum tum, chachi 420, zinda, ek ruka hua faisla, satte pe satta, sholay, qayamat, ghulam, and a boatload of other shameless rip-offs and i was just marvelling at the irony of the situation.
It's not a wrong though and even if it was, it's not their idea to begin with, they stole it from Hunger Games and Battle Royale.
Bollywood applying for stolen ideas is like China claiming their knockoffs are actually the original
The movie "Luck" came out 13 years before Squid Game...
Hard to steal content from the future.
Reread the comment above you, because they are claiming the opposite of what you're thinking
Good artists copy. Great artists steal.
—a whole lot of people who stole from each other
Kaiji anime did it first snyway
They're both just rip offs of Agatha Christie's 1939 novel "10 Little Indians."
Now known as "And Then There Were None."
10 Little Indians was actually the second title for the book. The first one was worse.
Great mystery though.
Loved it; but I thought the ending was cheating. How was I supposed to solve that on my own?!
STOP PLAYING GAMES WITH ME, NETFLIX! I TOLD YOU, IT'S OVER BETWEEN US!