this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
147 points (90.6% liked)

politics

18863 readers
3940 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 92 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No we haven’t. There’s still that big ELECTION we have to win. Please vote on November 5th so we can reach the other end of the bridge.

[–] Awkwardly_Frank@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

You're not wrong, but winning the election isn't the bridge the article is talking about. There's room for both conversations in the world, and talking about the potential shift taking place in The Democratic Party may help them to win more elections.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hey, motherjones, you're better than this shit.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago

Mother Jones would be turning in her grave knowing what the magazine bearing her name fights for these days.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Joe Biden promised to be a bridge

No he didn't. The whole "Joe Biden transitional candidate who won't run for a second term" story was invented from whole cloth by Politico and then the neoliberal media just went with it to try to mollify worried progressives who didn't want a conservative president for 8 years.

Biden never said any such thing, refuted it whenever asked, and stubbornly held on for a month for his own sake when it became clear to even most of his most ardent supporters that he was bound to lose and needed to go.

This phony celebration of Biden as heroically self-sacrificing is just cringy and weird.

[–] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

While I doubt it was planned that way, Biden holding off resulted in some funny trump hissy fits and helped show him up as the weird old man that he is.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, actually doing it after RNC was a perfect timing.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Timing that a 50yr+ politician like Joe would understand how to use.

My conspiracy is that he opted to leave earlier than advertised, but kept up the public face just to trap Trump. It wouldn't be the first time he's pulled some excellent bullshit to get something done.

[–] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not only just to trap Trump, but also to coalesce everyone behind a successor candidate. Because the only thing worse than Biden staying in the race would have been him dropping out and then a dozen Democrat candidates popping up, vying for the nomination, barely 5 months before the election. Further infighting would have handed the election to the weirdos.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago

I think this could be a consideration. I also like how it’s a taste of what a short election cycle could look like.

All the other democracies have weeks or possible months to campaign. We have 2+ fucking years of this garbage. It’s exhausting and a total waste of time, money, and governing opportunity.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's not fair. A president giving up power is a big deal. It shows integrity. Do you see Trump EVER doing anything even remotely as selfless?

Biden didn't have to step down. He could have driven everything into the ground to hold on to power, which btw pretty much any other politican WOULD have, but he didn't.