this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
153 points (98.1% liked)

News

23310 readers
3526 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

RIP Florida.

Detroit could be a gold mine.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 13 points 2 months ago

The insurers are onto it. They don’t want to ensure those houses.

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Detroit definitely is. Stuff is cheap there and things are turning around, just doesn't have the momentum or wider recognition of any of this yet.

There's a reason why Portland Oregon was so well known for being weird. Parts of the city were dingy for a long time but if you were glass half full about that it meant living there was affordable. All the poor creatives could live in a city open to change, not just the folks with high paying bullshit jobs that normally are the only ones who can afford to live close to work in the city.

If I had the money to invest in some real estate, I would have bought stuff in the Detroit area since it's got all the same ingredients to be the next Portland

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Just don't watch Barbarian before you do lol

underground rooms

square footage

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Detroit still has the crime though, even the nice areas have trouble every now and then.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago

The wealthy have been using housing as its own stock market/for money laundering and artificially inflated it. Similar to Tesla. And it's partially subsidized by us, the poor person buying their inflated houses.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure my house is worth more than the houses on either side of me. The lady who owned one died and apparently there's no clear line of inheritance, so it's been empty for years. We're not sure what happened on the other side, probably a foreclosure, but the family who lived there left in a real hurry and then some squatters lived there for a while.

We have a relatively modest ranch house built in the 1980s, so it's not exactly up to code these days. Three bedrooms, 1600 square feet, no basement, unfinished attic. The much larger squatter house is worth far less than ours because the inside is just wrecked. I wouldn't even trust standing on the second floor based on the photos I've seen on Zillow.

[–] JoeyHarrington@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Buy it and expand your lot size

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Serious answer: If I could afford to and put low-cost housing there, I absolutely would.

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you're in Oregon or Washington and west of the Cascades your house is worth what it's valued. The wildfire threat almost entirely stops at the mountains.

Unfortunately the smoke doesn't but it looks like the rest of the continent is getting it lately too.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That area has its own hazard, in the form of earthquake risk.

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

True, but as far as anyone knows that’s not a risk amplified or mitigated by climate change. Shouldn’t affect prices like a growing wildfire or hurricane threat would

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

It's not affected by climate change, but it's a risk which wasn't known when a lot of the area was built up. There's a very real potential of people realizing the risk and making decisions to reduce their exposure.