this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
118 points (88.3% liked)

World News

38506 readers
2702 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Throughout history many traditions have believed that some fatal flaw in human nature tempts us to pursue powers we don’t know how to handle. The Greek myth of Phaethon told of a boy who discovers that he is the son of Helios, the sun god. Wishing to prove his divine origin, Phaethon demands the privilege of driving the chariot of the sun. Helios warns Phaethon that no human can control the celestial horses that pull the solar chariot. But Phaethon insists, until the sun god relents. After rising proudly in the sky, Phaethon indeed loses control of the chariot. The sun veers off course, scorching all vegetation, killing numerous beings and threatening to burn the Earth itself. Zeus intervenes and strikes Phaethon with a thunderbolt. The conceited human drops from the sky like a falling star, himself on fire. The gods reassert control of the sky and save the world.

Two thousand years later, when the Industrial Revolution was making its first steps and machines began replacing humans in numerous tasks, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe published a similar cautionary tale titled The Sorcerer’s Apprentice. Goethe’s poem (later popularised as a Walt Disney animation starring Mickey Mouse) tells of an old sorcerer who leaves a young apprentice in charge of his workshop and gives him some chores to tend to while he is gone, such as fetching water from the river. The apprentice decides to make things easier for himself and, using one of the sorcerer’s spells, enchants a broom to fetch the water for him. But the apprentice doesn’t know how to stop the broom, which relentlessly fetches more and more water, threatening to flood the workshop. In panic, the apprentice cuts the enchanted broom in two with an axe, only to see each half become another broom. Now two enchanted brooms are inundating the workshop with water. When the old sorcerer returns, the apprentice pleads for help: “The spirits that I summoned, I now cannot rid myself of again.” The sorcerer immediately breaks the spell and stops the flood. The lesson to the apprentice – and to humanity – is clear: never summon powers you cannot control.

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treedrake@fedia.io 27 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Luckily the only "AI" we have are LLMs which seem to have hit their peak, and probably will start corrupting itself with its own training data now that they've scoured the web clean.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

LLM's on their own aren't much a concern. What is a concern is strapping weapons to one of those Boston Dynamics robots, loading an LLM, and training it to kill.

Governments already kill based on metadata — analyzed by statistical models — so the above isn't far from reality.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Turn it on, let us kill our enemies"

immediately starts quoting Shakespeare

I am uncertain why you think an LLM would be well suited to this task - it's an inappropriate model for that function...

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think there’s still a lot of room to grow with LLMs, but nothing will ever be 100% trustworthy. Especially the human brain.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The human brain has curiosity and asks questions, which is the best way to learn. The LLM has no curiosity and is just fed data, which is the worst way to learn.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The human brain is only as good as the data it has ingested. And I would argue humans are wrong more often than LLMs

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can you provide evidence to that effect? And can you prove that what they get wrong is on the same level of error as LLMs?

[–] ravhall@discuss.online -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can you provide evidence to the contrary?

I’m just going to ask ChatGPT to answer you, and unless you can come up with some kind of scientific study, you’ll lose. 🤪

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That's not the way it works. It's not my job to prove your claims are wrong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Speek four yurselve. I'm gud.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ravhall@discuss.online 1 points 2 weeks ago

🤷‍♂️

[–] mashbooq@infosec.pub 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sigh, another major thinker who totally misunderstands LLMs and their capabilities. The fact that he cites Musk as a credible source on "AI" says it all.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"Major thinker" is a stretch. He's more like the Malcolm Gladwell mom says we have at home.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A 2014 survey of British MPs – charged with regulating one of the world’s most important financial hubs – found that only 12% accurately understood that new money is created when banks make loans.

I don't really expect most people to know this one, but 12% of British parliamentarians is a little disappointing.

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When 11 people all own the same dollar, there's more dollars.

It's a 1 minute explanation I got as a junior in high school over 30 years ago. It's not hard to remember either. Banking changed things.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Little clunky, but that's an interesting way of communicating it.

[–] slimarev92@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

With all due respect, what makes him an expert on the subject?

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

Well, he wrote a couple of books where he waffles for 600 pages

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

“Never call up that which you cannot put down” — H.P. Lovecraft

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"[A whole bunch of extremely racist stuff.]" -- H.P. Lovecraft

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That too. To him, the difference between, say, Italians, mixed-race sailors with disturbingly un-Episcopalian cultural practices, mixed-species human-fish hybrids worshipping hideous idols in underwater cities and non-Euclidean gods of madness in the spaces between space was a quantitative rather than qualitative one.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He came up with some great ideas, but there's only so many times I can read about big-lipped, dark-skinned, ignorant natives and be able to continue on.

And then there's The Rats in the Walls. The less said about that, the better.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

Awaken. Awaken. Awaken. Awaken.
Take the land that must be taken.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What we have now is not the AI we need to fear. The only thing to fear in LLMs is blindly trusting them.

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Layoffs are occurring and LLMs are being cited as taking those jobs.

While I'm not concerned an LLM will take my job - nor that my leadership would do that - others do not have that luxury.

Sucks that we're here, but it's happening to some.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, let’s use the famously true stories of ancient mythology to prove a point about modern technology. That will definitely not be full of logical fallacies.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

You must make sure all your wards are inscribed correctly.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Any warlock could have told you that

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago

The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Guardian:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/aug/24/yuval-noah-harari-ai-book-extract-nexus
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support